National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
Risk factors for adolescent alcohol use are typically conceptualized at the individual level, and school- and community-level risk factors have received little attention. Based on the theoretical understanding of youth alcohol consumption as a reflection of community social practice, we analyzed whether adolescent drunkenness was related to community-level adult alcohol use (AAC), when taking individual and school-level risk factors for drunkenness into account. Furthermore, we investigated whether the association between community-level AAC and adolescent drunkenness was attenuated after inclusion of parental drinking.
We used data from three sources: data about adolescent drunkenness from the Health Behavior in School-Aged Children 2010 survey (N = 2,911; 13- to 15-year-olds nested in 175 school classes and 51 schools); data about community-level AAC derived from the Danish National Health Survey 2010 (177,639 participants); and data on school-level variables from Health Behavior in School-Aged Children School Leader Survey 2010. We performed multilevel logistic regression analysis with data from students nested within school classes and schools.
Overall, 33.5% of students had been drunk twice or more. High community-level AAC was significantly associated with adolescent drunkenness (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.94 [1.21-3.11]). Parental drinking was strongly related to adolescent drunkenness but did not attenuate the relationship between community-level AAC and adolescent drunkenness. We found no association between adolescent drunkenness and school-level variables (youth friendly environment, alcohol education, and exposure to alcohol outlets).
Adolescent drunkenness was associated with community-level AAC and was not explained by parental drinking.
青少年饮酒的风险因素通常在个体层面上进行概念化,而学校和社区层面的风险因素则很少受到关注。基于将青年饮酒视为社区社会实践反映的理论理解,我们分析了当考虑到个体和学校层面的醉酒风险因素时,青少年醉酒是否与社区层面的成人饮酒(AAC)有关。此外,我们还调查了在纳入父母饮酒后,社区层面的 AAC 与青少年醉酒之间的关联是否减弱。
我们使用了三个来源的数据:来自 2010 年《儿童青少年健康行为调查》的青少年醉酒数据(N=2911;嵌套在 175 个班级和 51 所学校中的 13 至 15 岁儿童);来自 2010 年丹麦全国健康调查的社区层面 AAC 数据(177639 名参与者);以及来自 2010 年《儿童青少年健康行为学校领导调查》的学校层面变量数据。我们对嵌套在班级和学校内的学生数据进行了多层次逻辑回归分析。
总体而言,有 33.5%的学生曾两次或更多次醉酒。高社区层面的 AAC 与青少年醉酒显著相关(比值比[95%置信区间],1.94[1.21-3.11])。父母饮酒与青少年醉酒密切相关,但并未减弱社区层面 AAC 与青少年醉酒之间的关系。我们没有发现青少年醉酒与学校层面变量(青年友好环境、酒精教育和接触酒精销售点)之间的关联。
青少年醉酒与社区层面的 AAC 相关,并且不能用父母饮酒来解释。