Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jul 18;54(7):4821-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12217.
To develop and validate a novel automated system to assess ocular redness (OR) in clinical images.
We developed a novel software that quantifies OR in digital images based on a mathematic algorithm using a centesimal continuous scoring scale. Subsequently, we conducted a study to validate the scores obtained with this system by correlating them with those obtained by two physicians using two image-based comparative subjective scales, the Efron and the Validated Bulbar Redness (VBR) grading scales. Additionally, we evaluated the level of clinical agreement between the Ocular Redness Index (ORI) score and the two image-based methods by means of the Bland-Altman analysis. Main outcome measures included correlation and level of agreement between the ORI score, Efron score, and the VBR score.
One hundred and two clinical photographs of eyes with OR were evaluated. The ORI scores significantly correlated with the scores obtained by the two clinicians using the Efron (Observer 1, R=0.925, P<0.001; Observer 2, R=0.857, P<0.001), and VBR (Observer 1, R=0.830, P<0.001; Observer 2, R=0.821, P<0.001) scales. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed levels of disagreement of up to 30 and 27 units for the ORI-Efron and ORI-VBR score comparisons, respectively.
The ORI provides an objective and continuous scale for evaluating ocular injection in an automated manner, and without need for a trained physician for scoring. The ORI may be used as a new alternative for objective OR evaluation in clinics and in clinical trials.
开发和验证一种新的自动系统,以评估临床图像中的眼部充血(OR)。
我们开发了一种新的软件,该软件使用基于数学算法的百分连续评分量表来量化数字图像中的 OR。随后,我们进行了一项研究,通过将该系统获得的评分与两位医生使用两种基于图像的比较主观量表(Efron 和 Validated Bulbar Redness(VBR)分级量表)获得的评分进行相关,来验证该系统获得的评分。此外,我们通过 Bland-Altman 分析评估了 Ocular Redness Index(ORI)评分与两种基于图像的方法之间的临床一致性水平。主要观察指标包括 ORI 评分、Efron 评分和 VBR 评分之间的相关性和一致性水平。
评估了 102 张眼部充血的临床照片。ORI 评分与两位医生使用 Efron(观察者 1,R=0.925,P<0.001;观察者 2,R=0.857,P<0.001)和 VBR(观察者 1,R=0.830,P<0.001;观察者 2,R=0.821,P<0.001)量表获得的评分显著相关。Bland-Altman 分析显示,ORI-Efron 和 ORI-VBR 评分比较的差异水平分别高达 30 和 27 个单位。
ORI 提供了一种客观的、连续的自动评估眼部充血的量表,且无需经过训练的医生进行评分。ORI 可作为诊所和临床试验中客观评估 OR 的新替代方法。