• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房的住院时间。实践指南和反馈的影响。

Length of stay in the intensive care unit. Effects of practice guidelines and feedback.

作者信息

Eagle K A, Mulley A G, Skates S J, Reder V A, Nicholson B W, Sexton J O, Barnett G O, Thibault G E

机构信息

Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

JAMA. 1990;264(8):992-7.

PMID:2376892
Abstract

We developed consensus management guidelines for patients admitted with chest pain, pulmonary edema, and syncope and used these guidelines to examine practice variation and the effects of physician feedback on decision making in 1145 consecutive admissions to three medical intensive care units. Data collection included a 6-month baseline period and two 6-month physician feedback periods. Hospital length of stay fell from 8.34 days to 7.41 and 7.14 days during feedback; intensive care unit length of stay fell from 2.45 days to 2.23 and 2.07 days. Feedback was associated with an increase in the percentage of patients conforming to the management guidelines. Multiple linear regression showed that feedback correlated with reductions of 0.79 days (confidence interval, 0.12 to 1.46) in hospital length of stay and 0.21 days (confidence interval 0.05 to 0.37) in intensive care unit length of stay. This effect was most apparent in patients not requiring any intervention, but with a major complication. During the 6-month follow-up, mortality, readmission, and urgent readmission rates were similar for patients admitted in baseline and feedback periods.

摘要

我们制定了针对胸痛、肺水肿和晕厥入院患者的共识管理指南,并使用这些指南来研究实践差异以及医师反馈对三个医疗重症监护病房连续1145例入院患者决策的影响。数据收集包括一个6个月的基线期和两个6个月的医师反馈期。在反馈期间,住院时间从8.34天降至7.41天和7.14天;重症监护病房住院时间从2.45天降至2.23天和2.07天。反馈与符合管理指南的患者百分比增加相关。多元线性回归显示,反馈与住院时间减少0.79天(置信区间为0.12至1.46)以及重症监护病房住院时间减少0.21天(置信区间为0.05至0.37)相关。这种效果在不需要任何干预但有重大并发症的患者中最为明显。在6个月的随访期间,基线期和反馈期入院患者的死亡率、再入院率和紧急再入院率相似。

相似文献

1
Length of stay in the intensive care unit. Effects of practice guidelines and feedback.重症监护病房的住院时间。实践指南和反馈的影响。
JAMA. 1990;264(8):992-7.
2
Variation in intensive care unit practices in two community hospitals.两家社区医院重症监护病房的实践差异。
Med Care. 1991 Dec;29(12):1237-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199112000-00006.
3
Gender and hospital resource use. Unexpected differences.性别与医院资源利用。意外差异。
Eval Health Prof. 1993 Jun;16(2):177-89. doi: 10.1177/016327879301600203.
4
Elimination of daily routine chest radiographs does not change on-demand radiography practice in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients.在心胸外科手术后的患者中,取消每日常规胸部X光检查并不会改变按需进行X光检查的做法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Jul;134(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.02.029.
5
Hospital mortality rate and length of stay in patients admitted at night to the intensive care unit.夜间入住重症监护病房患者的医院死亡率和住院时间。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):858-63. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000055378.31408.26.
6
Rationing intensive care--physician responses to a resource shortage.重症监护资源分配——医生对资源短缺的应对措施
N Engl J Med. 1983 Nov 10;309(19):1155-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198311103091905.
7
An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill.针对重症患者的强化沟通干预。
Am J Med. 2000 Oct 15;109(6):469-75. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00524-6.
8
Physician practice and feedback of information.
Med Group Manage J. 1994 Jan-Feb;41(1):6, 8.
9
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.一项改善重症住院患者护理的对照试验。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究(SUPPORT)。SUPPORT主要研究者。
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591-8.
10
Quality improvement and cost savings after implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard at a community teaching hospital.在社区教学医院实施 Leapfrog 重症监护病房医师人员配备标准后的质量改进和成本节约。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2754-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825b26ef.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical pathways for secondary care and the effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs.二级医疗的临床路径及其对专业实践、患者结局、住院时间和医院成本的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 14;5(5):CD006632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub3.
2
Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.闭环:儿科转科后随访和反馈计划的程序描述和定性分析。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1535-e1543. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002108.
3
Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care.
评价一种定制的多方面绩效反馈干预措施对提高护理质量的效果:一项在重症监护中的集群随机试验的方案。
Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 24;6:119. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-119.
4
Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcomes in a managed care setting.
J Ment Health Adm. 1995 Summer;22(3):226-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02521118.
5
Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for stress ulcer prophylaxis increases appropriateness and decreases cost of care.实施应激性溃疡预防临床实践指南可提高适宜性并降低护理成本。
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Mar;24(3):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s001340050553.
6
Predicting outcomes: routine versus special data, groups versus individuals.
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Feb;11(2):130-1. doi: 10.1007/BF02599591.
7
Is cardiac test availability a significant factor in weekend delays in discharge for chest pain patients?
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Oct;8(10):573-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02599642.
8
Medical practice guidelines.医学实践指南
West J Med. 1994 Jul;161(1):39-44.
9
The adoption of preventive care practice guidelines by primary care physicians: do actions match intentions?
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Mar;10(3):138-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02599668.
10
Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南的评估
CMAJ. 1995 Dec 1;153(11):1575-81.