Rosas Juan M, Todd Travis P, Bouton Mark E
Departamento Psicologia, Universidad de Jaén, Jaen, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 May;4(3):237-244. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
This article reviews the effects of changing the background context on performance in associative learning tasks in humans and animals. The findings are complementary and consistent over animal conditioning (Pavlovian and instrumental learning) and human predictive learning and memory paradigms. In many cases, a context change after learning can have surprisingly little disruptive influence on performance. Extinction, or retroactive interference treatments more generally, is more context-specific than the initial learning. Contexts become important if the participant is exposed to any of several treatments that involve prediction error, which may serve to increase attention to the context. Contexts also become important if they are given predictive or informational value. Studies of instrumental (operant) learning are further consistent with the idea that the context might also influence affordances that support voluntary actions. Context switch effects are not universal, but mainly occur when certain attention and perception processes can come into play. WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:237-244. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225 This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning.
本文综述了改变背景情境对人类和动物联想学习任务表现的影响。这些发现在动物条件反射(巴甫洛夫条件反射和工具性学习)以及人类预测学习和记忆范式中是互补且一致的。在许多情况下,学习后情境的改变对表现的干扰影响出奇地小。消退,或者更一般地说,逆向干扰处理,比初始学习更具情境特异性。如果参与者接触到任何涉及预测误差的几种处理方式,情境就会变得重要,这可能有助于增加对情境的关注。如果情境被赋予预测或信息价值,它们也会变得重要。工具性(操作性)学习的研究进一步支持了这样一种观点,即情境也可能影响支持自愿行动的可供性。情境转换效应并非普遍存在,而是主要发生在某些注意力和感知过程能够发挥作用的时候。《认知科学前沿》2013年,4:237 - 244。doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225 本文分类于:心理学>学习。