Hursting S D, Thornquist M, Henderson M M
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Prev Med. 1990 May;19(3):242-53. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90025-f.
The specificity of a statistical association increases the likelihood that it represents a causal relationship. In exploring the relationship between dietary fat and cancer, specificity applies both to cancer sites (outcome) and to component fats (exposure). In this study, Armstrong-Doll criteria were used to select female cancer incidence data for breast, cervix, lung, and colon, and male incidence data for lung, colon, and prostate for 1973-1977 from 20 countries with reliable registry data. Truncated age-standardized rates were correlated with estimates of per capita disappearance of total fat and of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated (total, fish omega-3, omega-6) fats in 1975-1977. Multiple regression analyses were standardized for estimated total calorie intakes and used to assess the association between each fat and incidence at each cancer site. Estimates of per capita dietary and crude fiber intakes were also included in the analysis. Total calorie intake was not associated with cancer at any site when controlled for total fat intake, whereas total fat intake was strongly associated with cancers of the breast, colon, and prostate even after adjustment for total calorie intake. Cancers of the lung and cervix were not correlated with dietary fat intake. Monounsaturated fat had no positive association with cancer at any site. Saturated fat was positively associated with incidence of cancers of the breast, colon, and prostate and polyunsaturated fat was associated with incidence of breast and prostate cancers but not colon cancer. Fiber intake, when included in the analysis, affected the magnitude of the fat-cancer correlations, particularly between total fat and colon cancer. Fish omega-3 polyunsaturated fat had a nonsignificant negative association with the cancer sites studied. The findings supported hypotheses based on the results of animal experiments showing that different kinds of fatty acids have different tumor-promoting capabilities.
统计关联的特异性增加了其代表因果关系的可能性。在探索膳食脂肪与癌症之间的关系时,特异性既适用于癌症部位(结果),也适用于脂肪成分(暴露因素)。在本研究中,采用阿姆斯特朗-多尔标准,从20个拥有可靠登记数据的国家中选取了1973 - 1977年女性乳腺癌、宫颈癌、肺癌和结肠癌以及男性肺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌的发病数据。将截短的年龄标准化发病率与1975 - 1977年人均总脂肪以及饱和、单不饱和和多不饱和(总、鱼类ω-3、ω-6)脂肪消失量的估计值进行关联分析。多元回归分析针对估计的总热量摄入进行了标准化处理,并用于评估每种脂肪与每个癌症部位发病率之间的关联。分析中还纳入了人均膳食和膳食纤维摄入量的估计值。在控制总脂肪摄入量后,总热量摄入与任何部位的癌症均无关联,而即使在调整总热量摄入后,总脂肪摄入量仍与乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌密切相关。肺癌和宫颈癌与膳食脂肪摄入量无关。单不饱和脂肪与任何部位的癌症均无正相关。饱和脂肪与乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌的发病率呈正相关,多不饱和脂肪与乳腺癌和前列腺癌的发病率相关,但与结肠癌无关。纳入分析的膳食纤维摄入量影响了脂肪与癌症相关性的大小,尤其是总脂肪与结肠癌之间的相关性。鱼类ω-3多不饱和脂肪与所研究的癌症部位呈非显著负相关。这些发现支持了基于动物实验结果的假设,即不同种类的脂肪酸具有不同的促肿瘤能力。