1Medical Mission,Tzu Chi Foundation,Hualien,Taiwan.
2Department of Family Medicine,Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital,No. 2 Min-Sheng Road,Dalin Town,Chiayi County,Taiwan62247.
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jul;17(7):1459-66. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001560. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
To assess the relative validity and reproducibility of the quantitative FFQ used in the Tzu Chi Health Study (TCHS).
The reproducibility was evaluated by comparing the baseline FFQ with the 2-year follow-up FFQ. The validity was evaluated by comparing the baseline FFQ with 3 d dietary records and biomarkers (serum folate and vitamin B12). Median comparison, cross-classification and Spearman correlation with and without energy adjustment and deattenuation for day-to-day variation were assessed.
TCHS is a prospective cohort containing a high proportion of true vegetarians and part-time vegetarians (regularly consuming a vegetarian diet without completely avoiding meat).
Subsets of 103, seventy-eight and 1528 TCHS participants were included in the reproducibility, dietary record-validity and biomarker-validity studies, respectively.
Correlations assessing the reproducibility for repeat administrations of the FFQ were in the range of 0·46-0·65 for macronutrients and 0·35-0·67 for micronutrients; the average same quartile agreement was 40%. The correlation between FFQ and biomarkers was 0·41 for both vitamin B12 and folate. Moderate to good correlations between the baseline FFQ and dietary records were found for energy, protein, carbohydrate, saturated and monounsaturated fat, fibre, vitamin C, vitamin A, K, Ca, Mg, P, Fe and Zn (average crude correlation: 0·47 (range: 0·37-0·66); average energy-adjusted correlation: 0·43 (range: 0·38-0·55); average energy-adjusted deattenuated correlation: 0·50 (range: 0·44-0·66)) with same quartile agreement rate of 39% (range: 35-45%), while misclassification to the extreme quartile was rare (average: 4% (range: 0-6%)).
The FFQ is a reliable and valid tool to rank relative intake of major nutrients for TCHS participants.
评估慈济健康研究(TCHS)中使用的定量 FFQ 的相对有效性和可重复性。
通过比较基线 FFQ 与 2 年随访 FFQ 来评估可重复性。通过比较基线 FFQ 与 3 天饮食记录和生物标志物(血清叶酸和维生素 B12)来评估有效性。评估了中位数比较、交叉分类和 Spearman 相关性,以及是否进行了能量调整和逐日变异衰减。
TCHS 是一个前瞻性队列,其中包含大量真正的素食者和兼职素食者(定期食用素食但不完全避免肉类)。
分别有 103、78 和 1528 名 TCHS 参与者参加了可重复性、饮食记录有效性和生物标志物有效性研究。
评估 FFQ 重复给药的可重复性的相关性在宏观营养素的 0.46-0.65 之间,在微量营养素的 0.35-0.67 之间;平均相同四分位数一致性为 40%。FFQ 与生物标志物之间的相关性对于维生素 B12 和叶酸均为 0.41。基线 FFQ 与饮食记录之间发现了能量、蛋白质、碳水化合物、饱和脂肪和单不饱和脂肪、纤维、维生素 C、维生素 A、K、Ca、Mg、P、Fe 和 Zn 的中等至良好相关性(平均粗相关系数:0.47(范围:0.37-0.66);平均能量调整后的相关系数:0.43(范围:0.38-0.55);平均能量调整后衰减的相关系数:0.50(范围:0.44-0.66)),相同四分位数一致性率为 39%(范围:35-45%),而极端四分位数的分类错误很少(平均:4%(范围:0-6%))。
FFQ 是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于对 TCHS 参与者的主要营养素相对摄入量进行排序。