• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Replication and extension: separate personality traits from states to predict depression.复制和扩展:将人格特质与状态分开以预测抑郁。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Apr;28(2):225-46. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_117. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
2
Deterioration in psychosocial functioning predicts relapse/recurrence after cognitive therapy for depression.心理社会功能的恶化预示着抑郁症认知治疗后的复发/再发。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
3
Stability and Change in Relations Between Personality Traits and the Interpersonal Problems Circumplex During Cognitive Therapy for Recurrent Depression.复发性抑郁症认知治疗过程中人格特质与人际问题环性模型之间关系的稳定性与变化
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1158-1171. doi: 10.1177/10731911211005183. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.创伤后应激障碍样本中不适应和适应人格量表的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):911-24. doi: 10.1037/a0023985. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
5
Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2).大五人格量表的编制与验证——用于《非适应及适应人格量表第二版》(SNAP-2)。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):751-63. doi: 10.1037/a0026915. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
6
Reliability and validity of the Diagnostic Scales of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality-2 (SNAP-2) in Italian community-dwelling adults and psychiatric patients.《非适应和适应人格-2(SNAP-2)量表诊断量表在意大利社区居住成年人和精神科患者中的信度和效度》的意大利语译文。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Oct;33(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1037/pas0001041. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Personality self-reports are concurrently reliable and valid during acute depressive episodes.在急性抑郁发作期间,人格自我报告具有同时的可靠性和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Dec;89(1-3):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
8
Which depressive symptoms remain after response to cognitive therapy of depression and predict relapse and recurrence?哪些抑郁症状在对抑郁症的认知疗法反应后仍然存在,并预测复发和再发?
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jun;123(1-3):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
9
Self-harm subscale of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP): predicting suicide attempts over 8 years of follow-up.《非适应和适应人格量表》(SNAP)的自伤亚量表:对 8 年随访期间自杀未遂的预测。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;72(11):1522-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05583blu. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
10
Does temperamental instability support a continuity between bipolar II disorder and major depressive disorder?气质不稳定性是否支持双相II型障碍与重度抑郁症之间的连续性?
Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;21(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Maladaptive personality traits and the course of suicidal ideation in young adults with bipolar disorder: Cross-sectional and prospective approaches.适应不良人格特质与双相情感障碍年轻患者自杀意念的病程:横断面和前瞻性研究。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Jun;51(3):394-402. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12684. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Do patients' cognitive therapy skills predict personality change during treatment of depression?患者的认知治疗技能能否预测抑郁症治疗期间的人格变化?
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Oct;133:103695. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103695. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Affective Changes During Cognitive Behavioural Therapy-As Measured by PANAS.认知行为疗法期间的情感变化——通过积极与消极情绪量表测量
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2017 Aug 25;13:115-124. doi: 10.2174/1745017901713010115. eCollection 2017.
4
Predicting individualized clinical measures by a generalized prediction framework and multimodal fusion of MRI data.通过广义预测框架和MRI数据的多模态融合预测个体化临床指标。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt B):218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Stable "trait" variance of temperament as a predictor of the temporal course of depression and social phobia.气质的稳定“特质”变异可预测抑郁和社交恐惧症的病程。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Aug;122(3):611-23. doi: 10.1037/a0032997.
2
The state effect of depressive and anxiety disorders on big five personality traits.抑郁和焦虑障碍对五大人格特质的状态影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 May;46(5):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
3
Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2).大五人格量表的编制与验证——用于《非适应及适应人格量表第二版》(SNAP-2)。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):751-63. doi: 10.1037/a0026915. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up.人格障碍替代模型的比较,II:6、8 和 10 年随访。
Psychol Med. 2012 Aug;42(8):1705-13. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002601. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
5
Neuroticism, depressive symptoms, and serum BDNF.神经质、抑郁症状与血清脑源性神经营养因子。
Psychosom Med. 2011 Oct;73(8):638-42. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182306a4f. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation.精神科实践中的基于测量的护理:实施的政策框架。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1136-43. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06282whi. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
7
Uncovering the affective core of conscientiousness: the role of self-conscious emotions.揭示尽责性的情感核心:自我意识情绪的作用。
J Pers. 2012 Feb;80(1):1-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00720.x.
8
Personality and depression: explanatory models and review of the evidence.人格与抑郁:解释模型与证据回顾。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:269-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104540.
9
Personality and bipolar disorder: dissecting state and trait associations between mood and personality.人格与双相障碍:剖析心境与人格之间的状态与特质关联。
Psychol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):1593-604. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002333. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
10
Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis.将“大”人格特质与焦虑、抑郁和物质使用障碍联系起来:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):768-821. doi: 10.1037/a0020327.

复制和扩展:将人格特质与状态分开以预测抑郁。

Replication and extension: separate personality traits from states to predict depression.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2014 Apr;28(2):225-46. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_117. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1521/pedi_2013_27_117
PMID:23786268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3855180/
Abstract

Changes in personality trait levels often parallel episodes of major depressive disorder (MDD), whereas trait factor structures and substantial retest correlations are preserved. The authors explicated this dual state/trait nature of personality assessments among adults with recurrent MDD (N = 351) receiving cognitive therapy (CT) by testing stability and change with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality, 2nd Edition (SNAP-2; Clark, Simms, Wu, & Casillas, in press), separating state and trait variance, and predicting depressive symptoms and clinical outcomes. Many SNAP scale scores changed in CT (e.g., positive temperament increased, negative temperament decreased), and decreases in depressive symptoms accounted for most scales' score changes. Nonetheless, SNAP scales' state and trait components predicted depressive symptoms early and late in CT as well as clinical outcomes, and state components predicted changes in symptoms and clinical outcomes. These results support the validity of the SNAP-2 among depressed patients and highlight the salience of personalityrelevant state affect.

摘要

人格特质水平的变化通常与重度抑郁症(MDD)的发作平行,而特质因素结构和大量重测相关性得以保留。作者通过测试认知疗法(CT)治疗的复发性 MDD 成年人(N=351)的适应和非适应人格量表第二版(SNAP-2;Clark、Simms、Wu 和 Casillas,即将出版)的稳定性和变化,分离状态和特质方差,并预测抑郁症状和临床结果,阐述了人格评估的这种双重状态/特质性质。在 CT 中,许多 SNAP 量表得分发生了变化(例如,积极气质增加,消极气质减少),而抑郁症状的减少解释了大多数量表得分变化的原因。尽管如此,SNAP 量表的状态和特质成分在 CT 的早期和晚期以及临床结果中预测了抑郁症状,而状态成分预测了症状和临床结果的变化。这些结果支持了 SNAP-2 在抑郁患者中的有效性,并强调了与人格相关的状态影响的重要性。