调节时的视网膜像质。

Retinal image quality during accommodation.

机构信息

Grupo de Ciencias de la Visión, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jul;33(4):497-507. doi: 10.1111/opo.12075.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We asked if retinal image quality is maximum during accommodation, or sub-optimal due to accommodative error, when subjects perform an acuity task.

METHODS

Subjects viewed a monochromatic (552 nm), high-contrast letter target placed at various viewing distances. Wavefront aberrations of the accommodating eye were measured near the endpoint of an acuity staircase paradigm. Refractive state, defined as the optimum target vergence for maximising retinal image quality, was computed by through-focus wavefront analysis to find the power of the virtual correcting lens that maximizes visual Strehl ratio.

RESULTS

Despite changes in ocular aberrations and pupil size during binocular viewing, retinal image quality and visual acuity typically remain high for all target vergences. When accommodative errors lead to sub-optimal retinal image quality, acuity and measured image quality both decline. However, the effect of accommodation errors of on visual acuity are mitigated by pupillary constriction associated with accommodation and binocular convergence and also to binocular summation of dissimilar retinal image blur. Under monocular viewing conditions some subjects displayed significant accommodative lag that reduced visual performance, an effect that was exacerbated by pharmacological dilation of the pupil.

CONCLUSIONS

Spurious measurement of accommodative error can be avoided when the image quality metric used to determine refractive state is compatible with the focusing criteria used by the visual system to control accommodation. Real focusing errors of the accommodating eye do not necessarily produce a reliably measurable loss of image quality or clinically significant loss of visual performance, probably because of increased depth-of-focus due to pupil constriction. When retinal image quality is close to maximum achievable (given the eye's higher-order aberrations), acuity is also near maximum. A combination of accommodative lag, reduced image quality, and reduced visual function may be a useful sign for diagnosing functionally-significant accommodative errors indicating the need for therapeutic intervention.

摘要

目的

当受试者进行视力任务时,我们想知道视网膜图像质量是在调节过程中最大,还是由于调节误差而处于次优状态。

方法

受试者观看放置在不同观察距离的单色(552nm)、高对比度字母目标。在视力阶梯范式的终点附近测量调节眼的波前像差。通过聚焦波前分析计算屈光状态,定义为最大化视网膜图像质量的最佳目标聚散度,以找到最大化视觉斯特雷尔比的虚拟矫正透镜的功率。

结果

尽管在双眼观察期间眼像差和瞳孔大小发生变化,但对于所有目标聚散度,视网膜图像质量和视力通常保持较高水平。当调节误差导致次优的视网膜图像质量时,视力和测量的图像质量都会下降。然而,调节误差对视力的影响会被调节相关的瞳孔收缩、双眼会聚和不同视网膜模糊的双眼总和所减轻。在单眼观察条件下,一些受试者显示出显著的调节滞后,降低了视觉表现,这种效应在瞳孔药理学扩张时会加剧。

结论

当用于确定屈光状态的图像质量指标与视觉系统用于控制调节的聚焦标准兼容时,可以避免对调节误差的虚假测量。调节眼的真实聚焦误差不一定会导致可测量的图像质量损失或临床上显著的视觉表现损失,可能是由于瞳孔收缩导致景深增加。当视网膜图像质量接近最大可达到的(考虑到眼睛的高阶像差)时,视力也接近最大。调节滞后、图像质量降低和视觉功能降低的组合可能是诊断功能显著的调节误差的有用标志,表明需要治疗干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索