Harris Donald G, Drucker Charles B, Brenner Megan L, Sarkar Rajabrata, Narayan Mayur, Crawford Robert S
University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;27(8):1074-80. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.09.019. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is historically associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Our institutional experience was analyzed to define current patterns of injury and to help guide management.
Adult patients with BAAI between January 2000 and July 2011 were identified from our trauma registry. Medical, radiographic, and autopsy records were reviewed for relevant clinical data. Management and outcomes were compared between patients with minimal aortic injury limited to the intima (MAI) compared to more significant aortic injury (SAI).
Nine patients had MAI and 8 had SAI, including 2 dissections, 2 pseudoaneurysms, 2 branch avulsions, 1 thrombosis, and 1 transection. The MAI and SAI groups had similar demographics and patterns of injury, and all patients had significant polytrauma, with a mean injury severity score of 42. More MAI than SAI patients were managed nonoperatively (100% vs. 38%; P=0.01). All observed patients underwent repeat imaging during the index admission, 85% within 72 hours, and no observed lesions led to malperfusion, death, or progression during the index admission. One MAI progressed to a pseudoaneurysm within 8 months. Five SAI patients underwent aortic-related repairs, including 2 endovascular stent grafts, 2 open primary repairs, and 1 axillobifemoral bypass. Overall, 15 (88%) patients underwent procedures for any injury-9 required laparotomy (53%) and 2 underwent thoracotomy. There were 6 (35%) deaths, 2 attributable to aortic injury-1 from hemorrhage and 1 from hyperkalemic cardiac arrest after prolonged ischemia from infrarenal aortic occlusion. Among patients who survived the initial resuscitation, SAI was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate compared to MAI (50% vs. 0%; P=0.03).
Patients with MAI are at low risk of complications and may be considered for observation. Patients with SAI requiring intervention manifest clinically and/or radiographically at presentation. Those not associated with bleeding, malperfusion, or thromboembolism may be observed with interval imaging. For all observed patients, long-term surveillance is required to document complete resolution or stability, because even MAI can progress to a more complex lesion.
钝性腹主动脉损伤(BAAI)历来与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。分析我们机构的经验,以确定当前的损伤模式并指导治疗。
从我们的创伤登记处识别出2000年1月至2011年7月期间患有BAAI的成年患者。查阅医疗、影像学和尸检记录以获取相关临床数据。比较仅限于内膜的轻微主动脉损伤(MAI)患者与更严重主动脉损伤(SAI)患者的治疗和结局。
9例患者为MAI,8例为SAI,包括2例夹层、2例假性动脉瘤、2例分支撕裂、1例血栓形成和1例横断。MAI组和SAI组的人口统计学和损伤模式相似,所有患者均有严重多发伤,平均损伤严重度评分为42分。非手术治疗的MAI患者多于SAI患者(100%对38%;P=0.01)。所有观察患者在首次住院期间均接受了重复影像学检查,85%在72小时内进行,且在首次住院期间未观察到病变导致灌注不良、死亡或进展。1例MAI在8个月内进展为假性动脉瘤。5例SAI患者接受了与主动脉相关的修复,包括2例血管腔内支架植入、2例开放一期修复和1例腋股动脉旁路移植术。总体而言,15例(88%)患者因任何损伤接受了手术治疗,9例需要剖腹手术(53%),2例需要开胸手术。有6例(35%)死亡,2例归因于主动脉损伤,1例死于出血,1例死于肾下腹主动脉闭塞长时间缺血后的高钾性心脏骤停。在最初复苏存活的患者中,SAI的死亡率显著高于MAI(50%对0%;P=0.03)。
MAI患者并发症风险低,可考虑观察。需要干预的SAI患者在就诊时临床和/或影像学表现明显。那些与出血、灌注不良或血栓栓塞无关的患者可通过间隔影像学检查进行观察。对于所有观察患者,需要长期监测以记录完全缓解或稳定情况,因为即使是MAI也可能进展为更复杂的病变。