• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

湿地修复的土地价值影响。

The land value impacts of wetland restoration.

机构信息

Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New East Building, CB #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3140, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:289-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.047. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.047
PMID:23792789
Abstract

U.S. regulations require offsets for aquatic ecosystems damaged during land development, often through restoration of alternative resources. What effect does large-scale wetland and stream restoration have on surrounding land values? Restoration effects on real estate values have substantial implications for protecting resources, increasing tax base, and improving environmental policies. Our analysis focuses on the three-county Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, North Carolina region, which has experienced rapid development and extensive aquatic ecological restoration (through the state's Ecosystem Enhancement Program [EEP]). Since restoration sites are not randomly distributed across space, we used a genetic algorithm to match parcels near restoration sites with comparable control parcels. Similar to propensity score analysis, this technique facilitates statistical comparison and isolates the effects of restoration sites on surrounding real estate values. Compared to parcels not proximate to any aquatic resources, we find that, 1) natural aquatic systems steadily and significantly increase parcel values up to 0.75 mi away, and 2) parcels <0.5 mi from EEP restoration sites have significantly lower sale prices, while 3) parcels >0.5 mi from EEP sites gain substantial amenity value. When we control for intervening water bodies (e.g. un-restored streams and wetlands), we find a similar inflection point whereby parcels <0.5 mi from EEP sites exhibit lower values, and sites 0.5-0.75 mi away exhibit increased values. Our work points to the need for higher public visibility of aquatic ecosystem restoration programs and increased public information about their value.

摘要

美国法规要求对土地开发过程中受损的水生生态系统进行补偿,通常是通过恢复替代资源来实现。大规模湿地和溪流恢复对周围土地价值有什么影响?恢复对房地产价值的影响对保护资源、增加税基和改善环境政策具有重大意义。我们的分析集中在北卡罗来纳州罗利-达勒姆-教堂山的三县地区,该地区经历了快速发展和广泛的水生生态恢复(通过该州的生态增强计划[EEP])。由于恢复地点不是随机分布在空间中的,我们使用遗传算法将靠近恢复地点的包裹与可比的对照包裹进行匹配。与倾向得分分析类似,这种技术促进了统计比较,并隔离了恢复地点对周围房地产价值的影响。与不靠近任何水生资源的包裹相比,我们发现:1)自然水生系统稳定且显著地增加了包裹价值,可达 0.75 英里远;2)距离 EEP 恢复地点<0.5 英里的包裹的销售价格显著降低,而 3)距离 EEP 地点>0.5 英里的包裹则获得了大量的附加价值。当我们控制中间水体(例如未恢复的溪流和湿地)时,我们发现了一个类似的转折点,即距离 EEP 地点<0.5 英里的包裹价值较低,而 0.5-0.75 英里的地点价值则增加。我们的工作表明,需要提高公众对水生生态系统恢复计划的可见度,并增加有关其价值的公众信息。

相似文献

1
The land value impacts of wetland restoration.湿地修复的土地价值影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:289-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.047. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
2
Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program.溪流和湿地缓解银行计划的景观特征。
Ecol Appl. 2009 Dec;19(8):2078-92. doi: 10.1890/08-1803.1.
3
Land use planning and social equity in North Carolina's compensatory wetland and stream mitigation programs.北卡罗来纳州补偿性湿地和溪流缓解计划中的土地利用规划和社会公平。
Environ Manage. 2011 Feb;47(2):239-53. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9594-z. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
4
Modelling hydrological effects of wetland restoration: a differentiated view.湿地恢复的水文效应建模:一种差异化观点。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(3):433-41. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.884.
5
Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale.模拟湿地保护-修复对流域尺度水量和水质的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Jul;91(7):1511-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
6
Forward-looking farmers owning multiple potential wetland restoration sites: implications for efficient restoration.拥有多个潜在湿地恢复地点的前瞻性农民:对高效恢复的影响。
Environ Manage. 2018 Apr;61(4):577-596. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1002-0. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria.量化生态系统服务权衡:以奥地利维也纳城市洪泛区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 30;111:159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
8
Impacts of human-induced environmental change in wetlands on aquatic animals.人类活动引起的湿地环境变化对水生动物的影响。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):529-554. doi: 10.1111/brv.12358. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
9
Negative off-site impacts of ecological restoration: understanding and addressing the conflict.生态修复的负面场外影响:理解并解决冲突
Conserv Biol. 2008 Oct;22(5):1118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01027.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
10
Risk and markets for ecosystem services.生态系统服务的风险和市场。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 15;45(24):10322-30. doi: 10.1021/es203201n. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid increases in bat activity and diversity after wetland construction in an urban ecosystem.城市生态系统中湿地建设后蝙蝠活动和多样性的快速增加。
Wetlands (Wilmington). 2019 Aug;39(4):717-727. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
Estimating the Size and Impact of the Ecological Restoration Economy.估算生态修复经济的规模与影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0128339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128339. eCollection 2015.