Northumbria Centre for Sleep Research, Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e002999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002999.
Despite sleep disturbances being a central complaint in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), evidence of objective sleep abnormalities from over 30 studies is inconsistent. The present study aimed to identify whether sleep-specific phenotypes exist in CFS and explore objective characteristics that could differentiate phenotypes, while also being relevant to routine clinical practice.
A cross-sectional, single-site study.
A fatigue clinic in the Netherlands.
A consecutive series of 343 patients meeting the criteria for CFS, according to the Fukuda definition.
Patients underwent a single night of polysomnography (all-night recording of EEG, electromyography, electrooculography, ECG and respiration) that was hand-scored by a researcher blind to diagnosis and patient history.
Of the 343 patients, 104 (30.3%) were identified with a Primary Sleep Disorder explaining their diagnosis. A hierarchical cluster analysis on the remaining 239 patients resulted in four sleep phenotypes being identified at saturation. Of the 239 patients, 89.1% met quantitative criteria for at least one objective sleep problem. A one-way analysis of variance confirmed distinct sleep profiles for each sleep phenotype. Relatively longer sleep onset latencies, longer Rapid Eye Movement (REM) latencies and smaller percentages of both stage 2 and REM characterised the first phenotype. The second phenotype was characterised by more frequent arousals per hour. The third phenotype was characterised by a longer Total Sleep Time, shorter REM Latencies, and a higher percentage of REM and lower percentage of wake time. The final phenotype had the shortest Total Sleep Time and the highest percentage of wake time and wake after sleep onset.
The results highlight the need to routinely screen for Primary Sleep Disorders in clinical practice and tailor sleep interventions, based on phenotype, to patients presenting with CFS. The results are discussed in terms of matching patients' self-reported sleep to these phenotypes in clinical practice.
尽管睡眠障碍是慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者的主要主诉,但来自 30 多项研究的证据表明,客观睡眠异常不一致。本研究旨在确定 CFS 是否存在特定的睡眠表型,并探索能够区分表型的客观特征,同时与常规临床实践相关。
横断面、单站点研究。
荷兰的一家疲劳诊所。
连续 343 例符合 Fukuda 定义的 CFS 标准的患者。
患者接受了一夜的多导睡眠图(整夜记录脑电图、肌电图、眼电图、心电图和呼吸),由一名对诊断和患者病史不知情的研究人员进行手工评分。
在 343 例患者中,有 104 例(30.3%)被确定为原发性睡眠障碍,从而解释了他们的诊断。对其余 239 例患者进行层次聚类分析,在达到饱和时确定了 4 种睡眠表型。在 239 例患者中,89.1%符合至少一种客观睡眠问题的定量标准。单因素方差分析证实,每种睡眠表型的睡眠特征明显不同。第一个表型的特征是入睡潜伏期相对较长,快速眼动(REM)潜伏期较长,2 期和 REM 的百分比较小。第二个表型的特征是每小时觉醒次数较多。第三个表型的特征是总睡眠时间较长,REM 潜伏期较短,REM 百分比较高,清醒时间百分比较低。最后一个表型的总睡眠时间最短,清醒时间百分比和醒来后睡眠开始时间百分比最高。
结果强调了在临床实践中需要常规筛查原发性睡眠障碍,并根据表型为出现 CFS 的患者量身定制睡眠干预措施。结果从将患者自我报告的睡眠与临床实践中的这些表型相匹配的角度进行了讨论。