Suozzi Brent A, O'Sullivan David M, Finnegan Kyle T, Steinberg Adam C
Division of Urogynecology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318298b364.
This study aimed to examine the correlation between visuospatial ability, measured with the Perceptual Ability Test (PAT), and da Vinci robot simulator performance on the da Vinci Skills Simulator.
Twenty-five consenting medical students naive to both the PAT and the da Vinci robot completed the PAT and then performed a single simulation (Ring-walk 2) 10 consecutive times. Raw PAT scores were compared with composite simulator scores for all subjects. Participants were divided into those with high and low visuospatial ability based on whether they scored above or below (or equal) to the median on the PAT. We compared the mean composite simulator scores and the time to complete each exercise between the high and the low PAT performers.
The mean (SD) raw PAT score (out of 90) was 45.5 (18.3) (median, 43.0). The mean composite simulator score was 65.5 (24.1) (median, 72.2). The high (n = 12) and low (n = 13) PAT performers had a mean (SD) (median) simulator score of 79.1 (9.8) (80.3) and 53.0 (26.7) (65.9), respectively. On average, the high PAT performers scored 26.1 points (95% confidence interval, 9.2-43.0, P = 0.005), or 49.2%, higher on the simulation than the low PAT performers. The high PAT performers completed the exercise in 96.5 seconds (95% confidence interval, 26.0-167.0; P = 0.009), or 36.2%, faster than the low PAT performers.
Better visuospatial ability relates to improved performance on a robotic surgery simulator.
本研究旨在探讨通过感知能力测试(PAT)测量的视觉空间能力与达芬奇机器人模拟器在达芬奇技能模拟器上的表现之间的相关性。
25名对PAT和达芬奇机器人均无经验的医学专业学生完成了PAT测试,然后连续10次进行单次模拟(环形行走2)。比较所有受试者的PAT原始分数与模拟器综合分数。根据PAT得分高于或低于(或等于)中位数,将参与者分为视觉空间能力高和低两组。我们比较了PAT表现高和低的参与者之间的平均模拟器综合分数以及完成每项练习的时间。
PAT原始分数(满分90分)的平均(标准差)为45.5(18.3)(中位数为43.0)。模拟器综合分数的平均值为65.5(24.1)(中位数为72.2)。PAT表现高(n = 12)和低(n = 13)的参与者的模拟器分数平均(标准差)(中位数)分别为79.1(9.8)(80.3)和53.0(26.7)(65.9)。平均而言,PAT表现高的参与者在模拟中的得分比PAT表现低的参与者高26.1分(95%置信区间,9.2 - 43.0,P = 0.005),即高出49.2%。PAT表现高的参与者完成练习的时间为96.5秒(95%置信区间,26.0 - 167.0;P = 0.009),比PAT表现低的参与者快36.2%。
更好的视觉空间能力与机器人手术模拟器上的表现改善有关。