Suppr超能文献

达芬奇技能模拟器用于评估机器人基本技能的学习曲线和基于标准的培训。

da Vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):562-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.020. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To answer 2 research questions: what are the learning curve patterns of novices on the da Vinci skills simulator parameters and what parameters are appropriate for criterion-based robotic training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 novices completed 2 simulator sessions within 3 days. Each training session consisted of a warming-up exercise, followed by 5 repetitions of the "ring and rail II" task. Expert participants (n = 3) performed a warming-up exercise and 3 repetitions of the "ring and rail II" task on 1 day. We analyzed all 9 parameters of the simulator.

RESULTS

Significant learning occurred on 5 parameters: overall score, time to complete, instrument collision, instruments out of view, and critical errors within 1-10 repetitions (P <.05). Economy of motion and excessive instrument force only showed improvement within the first 5 repetitions. No significant learning on the parameter drops and master workspace range was found. Using the expert overall performance score (n = 3) as a criterion (overall score 90%), 9 of 17 novice participants met the criterion within 10 repetitions.

CONCLUSION

Most parameters showed that basic robotic skills are learned relatively quickly using the da Vinci skills simulator, but that 10 repetitions were not sufficient for most novices to reach an expert level. Some parameters seemed inappropriate for expert-based criterion training because either no learning occurred or the novice performance was equal to expert performance.

摘要

目的

回答 2 个研究问题:新手在达芬奇技能模拟器参数上的学习曲线模式是什么,以及哪些参数适合基于标准的机器人训练。

材料与方法

共有 17 名新手在 3 天内完成了 2 次模拟器训练。每个训练课程都包括热身练习,然后是 5 次“环轨 II”任务重复。专家参与者(n=3)在 1 天内完成了热身练习和 3 次“环轨 II”任务重复。我们分析了模拟器的所有 9 个参数。

结果

在 5 个参数上出现了显著的学习:总体得分、完成时间、器械碰撞、器械视野外和 1-10 次重复内的关键错误(P<.05)。动作经济和过度器械力仅在前 5 次重复中有所提高。在参数下降和主工作空间范围方面未发现显著的学习。使用专家总体表现得分(n=3)作为标准(总体得分 90%),17 名新手参与者中有 9 名在 10 次重复内达到标准。

结论

大多数参数表明,使用达芬奇技能模拟器可以相对快速地学习基本的机器人技能,但大多数新手需要 10 次重复才能达到专家水平。一些参数似乎不适合基于专家的标准训练,因为要么没有学习发生,要么新手的表现与专家的表现相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验