• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病退伍军人起始使用二甲双胍、磺酰脲类或罗格列酮单药治疗的死亡率。

Mortality among veterans with type 2 diabetes initiating metformin, sulfonylurea or rosiglitazone monotherapy.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2013 Sep;56(9):1934-43. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2958-1. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00125-013-2958-1
PMID:23797633
Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESES: Despite oral hypoglycaemic medications being the most commonly used pharmacological treatments for type 2 diabetes, research is limited on their comparative safety, particularly their effects on overall mortality. We compared mortality risk with monotherapy initiation of four oral hypoglycaemic medications in a nationwide cohort of US veterans with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We identified new users of oral hypoglycaemic medication monotherapy between 2004 and 2009 who received care for at least 1 year from the Veterans Health Administration.Patients were followed until initial monotherapy discontinuation,addition of another diabetes pharmacotherapy, death or end of follow-up. Mortality HRs were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Among new users of metformin, sulfonylureas and rosiglitazone (185,360 men, 7,812 women), 4,256 (2.2%) died during follow-up. Average duration of medication use ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 years. Significantly higher mortality risk was seen for glibenclamide (known as glyburide in the USA and Canada) (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27, 1.50) or glipizide (HR 1.55,95% CI 1.43, 1.67) compared with metformin monotherapy,and for glipizide compared with rosiglitazone (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01, 1.59) or glibenclamide monotherapy (HR 1.12, 95%CI 1.02, 1.23). A significant sex–rosiglitazone interaction was seen (p=0.034) compared with metformin monotherapy, with women having a higher HR (HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.34, 14.20)than men (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95, 1.49).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: Significantly higher mortality was associated with glibenclamide, glipizide and rosiglitazone use compared with metformin, and with glipizide use compared with rosiglitazone or glibenclamide. The potential for residual confounding by indication should be considered in interpreting these results.

摘要

目的/假设:尽管口服降糖药是治疗 2 型糖尿病最常用的药物治疗方法,但关于其安全性的研究,特别是其对总死亡率的影响,仍十分有限。我们比较了在一个美国退伍军人 2 型糖尿病的全国队列中,四种口服降糖药单药治疗起始时的死亡率风险。

方法

我们确定了 2004 年至 2009 年间接受退伍军人健康管理局至少 1 年治疗的新使用口服降糖药单药治疗的患者。患者在初始单药治疗停药、加用另一种糖尿病药物治疗、死亡或随访结束前一直接受随访。使用 Cox 回归调整潜在混杂因素后,估计死亡率 HR。

结果

在新使用二甲双胍、磺酰脲类和罗格列酮的患者(185360 名男性,7812 名女性)中,有 4256 人(2.2%)在随访期间死亡。药物使用的平均持续时间从 1.4 年到 1.7 年不等。与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,格列本脲(美国和加拿大称为格列吡嗪)(HR 1.38,95%CI 1.27,1.50)或格列吡嗪(HR 1.55,95%CI 1.43,1.67)的死亡率风险显著升高,与罗格列酮(HR 1.27,95%CI 1.01,1.59)或格列本脲(HR 1.12,95%CI 1.02,1.23)单药治疗相比,格列吡嗪的死亡率风险也显著升高。与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,观察到性别-罗格列酮存在显著的交互作用(p=0.034),女性的 HR 更高(HR 4.36,95%CI 1.34,14.20),而男性的 HR 为 1.19(95%CI 0.95,1.49)。

结论/解释:与二甲双胍相比,格列本脲、格列吡嗪和罗格列酮的使用与更高的死亡率相关,与罗格列酮或格列本脲相比,格列吡嗪的使用与更高的死亡率相关。在解释这些结果时,应考虑到潜在的残余混杂因素。

相似文献

1
Mortality among veterans with type 2 diabetes initiating metformin, sulfonylurea or rosiglitazone monotherapy.2 型糖尿病退伍军人起始使用二甲双胍、磺酰脲类或罗格列酮单药治疗的死亡率。
Diabetologia. 2013 Sep;56(9):1934-43. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2958-1. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
2
Metformin-glibenclamide versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.二甲双胍-格列本脲与二甲双胍加罗格列酮用于二甲双胍单药治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的疗效比较
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006 Mar;8(2):156-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00570.x.
3
Mortality Associated with Metformin Versus Sulfonylurea Initiation: A Cohort Study of Veterans with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.与起始使用二甲双胍相比,起始使用磺酰脲类药物与死亡率的相关性:一项伴有糖尿病和慢性肾脏病的退伍军人队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):155-165. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4219-3. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
5
Association Between Metformin Initiation and Incident Dementia Among African American and White Veterans Health Administration Patients.二甲双胍的起始使用与非裔美国人和退伍军人健康管理局白人患者的痴呆症发病风险的相关性。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):352-362. doi: 10.1370/afm.2415.
6
Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylurea and metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍单药治疗 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件的效果比较:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):601-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00003.
7
Cancer and bone fractures in observational follow-up of the RECORD study.RECORD研究观察性随访中的癌症与骨折
Acta Diabetol. 2015 Jun;52(3):539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study of over 473,000 patients using the National Health Insurance database in Taiwan.噻唑烷二酮类药物与2型糖尿病患者的心血管事件:一项使用台湾国民健康保险数据库对超过473,000名患者进行的回顾性队列研究。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(8):675-90. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932080-00006.
9
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database.使用英国全科医疗研究数据库进行的回顾性队列研究:2型糖尿病患者口服抗糖尿病药物治疗后心血管疾病风险及全因死亡率
BMJ. 2009 Dec 3;339:b4731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4731.
10
Metformin in combination with various insulin secretagogues in type 2 diabetes and associated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality--a retrospective nationwide study.二甲双胍与各种胰岛素促分泌剂联合治疗 2 型糖尿病及相关心血管发病率和死亡率的风险:一项回顾性全国性研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;107(1):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.047. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
[The role of antidiabetic drugs in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review].[抗糖尿病药物在阿尔茨海默病治疗中的作用:系统评价]
Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2023 Nov 11;69(5):73-83. doi: 10.14341/probl13183.
2
A calibration approach to transportability and data-fusion with observational data.一种将观测数据进行可传输性和数据融合的校准方法。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 15;41(23):4511-4531. doi: 10.1002/sim.9523. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Antidiabetic Drugs in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.抗糖尿病药物治疗阿尔茨海默病。

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylurea and metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍单药治疗 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件的效果比较:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):601-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00003.
2
Cancer outcomes and all-cause mortality in adults allocated to metformin: systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.成人接受二甲双胍治疗的癌症结局和全因死亡率:随机临床试验的系统评价和协作荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2012 Oct;55(10):2593-2603. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2653-7. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
3
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 22;23(9):4641. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094641.
4
Trends in Timing of and Glycemia at Initiation of Second-line Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in U.S. Adults.美国成年人二线 2 型糖尿病治疗起始时的时机和血糖变化趋势。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jun 2;45(6):1335-1345. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2492.
5
Sex- and Gender-Based Pharmacological Response to Drugs.药物的基于性别的药理学反应
Pharmacol Rev. 2021 Apr;73(2):730-762. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000206.
6
Long-term metformin treatment and risk of peripheral neuropathy in older Veterans.长期二甲双胍治疗与老年退伍军人周围神经病变风险。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Dec;170:108486. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108486. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Gliclazide monotherapy increases risks of all-cause mortality and has similar risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke with glimepiride monotherapy in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus.在韩国2型糖尿病患者中,格列齐特单药治疗会增加全因死亡率风险,且与格列美脲单药治疗相比,急性心肌梗死和中风风险相似。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21236. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021236.
8
Sulfonylureas as initial treatment for type 2 diabetes and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: A population-based cohort study.磺酰脲类药物作为 2 型糖尿病的初始治疗与不良心血管事件风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2378-2389. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14056. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Oral diabetes medication monotherapy and short-term mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.2型糖尿病合并冠状动脉疾病患者的口服降糖药物单药治疗与短期死亡率
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 Jun 15;6(1):e000516. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000516. eCollection 2018.
10
Mortality Associated with Metformin Versus Sulfonylurea Initiation: A Cohort Study of Veterans with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.与起始使用二甲双胍相比,起始使用磺酰脲类药物与死亡率的相关性:一项伴有糖尿病和慢性肾脏病的退伍军人队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):155-165. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4219-3. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Oral pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.
《2 型糖尿病的口服药物治疗:美国医师学会临床实践指南》。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):218-31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00011.
4
Mortality after incident cancer in people with and without type 2 diabetes: impact of metformin on survival.有 2 型糖尿病和无 2 型糖尿病患者癌症发病后的死亡率:二甲双胍对生存的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):299-304. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1313. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
5
Rosiglitazone and the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.罗格列酮与不良心血管结局风险
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;89(6):776-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.43.
6
Is there clear and convincing evidence of cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone?罗格列酮是否有确凿证据表明存在心血管风险?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;89(6):773-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.65.
7
Mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with different insulin secretagogues compared with metformin in type 2 diabetes, with or without a previous myocardial infarction: a nationwide study.与二甲双胍相比,不同胰岛素促分泌剂在有或无既往心肌梗死的 2 型糖尿病患者中的死亡率和心血管风险:一项全国性研究。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(15):1900-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr077. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
8
Comparative cardiovascular effects of thiazolidinediones: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.噻唑烷二酮类药物的心血管系统比较作用:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 17;342:d1309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1309.
9
Rosiglitazone revisited: an updated meta-analysis of risk for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality.罗格列酮再探讨:心肌梗死风险与心血管死亡率的最新荟萃分析
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jul 26;170(14):1191-1201. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.207.
10
Risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and death in elderly Medicare patients treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone.在接受罗格列酮或吡格列酮治疗的老年医疗保险患者中,急性心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭和死亡的风险。
JAMA. 2010 Jul 28;304(4):411-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.920. Epub 2010 Jun 28.