Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病退伍军人起始使用二甲双胍、磺酰脲类或罗格列酮单药治疗的死亡率。

Mortality among veterans with type 2 diabetes initiating metformin, sulfonylurea or rosiglitazone monotherapy.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2013 Sep;56(9):1934-43. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2958-1. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESES: Despite oral hypoglycaemic medications being the most commonly used pharmacological treatments for type 2 diabetes, research is limited on their comparative safety, particularly their effects on overall mortality. We compared mortality risk with monotherapy initiation of four oral hypoglycaemic medications in a nationwide cohort of US veterans with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We identified new users of oral hypoglycaemic medication monotherapy between 2004 and 2009 who received care for at least 1 year from the Veterans Health Administration.Patients were followed until initial monotherapy discontinuation,addition of another diabetes pharmacotherapy, death or end of follow-up. Mortality HRs were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Among new users of metformin, sulfonylureas and rosiglitazone (185,360 men, 7,812 women), 4,256 (2.2%) died during follow-up. Average duration of medication use ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 years. Significantly higher mortality risk was seen for glibenclamide (known as glyburide in the USA and Canada) (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27, 1.50) or glipizide (HR 1.55,95% CI 1.43, 1.67) compared with metformin monotherapy,and for glipizide compared with rosiglitazone (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01, 1.59) or glibenclamide monotherapy (HR 1.12, 95%CI 1.02, 1.23). A significant sex–rosiglitazone interaction was seen (p=0.034) compared with metformin monotherapy, with women having a higher HR (HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.34, 14.20)than men (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95, 1.49).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: Significantly higher mortality was associated with glibenclamide, glipizide and rosiglitazone use compared with metformin, and with glipizide use compared with rosiglitazone or glibenclamide. The potential for residual confounding by indication should be considered in interpreting these results.

摘要

目的/假设:尽管口服降糖药是治疗 2 型糖尿病最常用的药物治疗方法,但关于其安全性的研究,特别是其对总死亡率的影响,仍十分有限。我们比较了在一个美国退伍军人 2 型糖尿病的全国队列中,四种口服降糖药单药治疗起始时的死亡率风险。

方法

我们确定了 2004 年至 2009 年间接受退伍军人健康管理局至少 1 年治疗的新使用口服降糖药单药治疗的患者。患者在初始单药治疗停药、加用另一种糖尿病药物治疗、死亡或随访结束前一直接受随访。使用 Cox 回归调整潜在混杂因素后,估计死亡率 HR。

结果

在新使用二甲双胍、磺酰脲类和罗格列酮的患者(185360 名男性,7812 名女性)中,有 4256 人(2.2%)在随访期间死亡。药物使用的平均持续时间从 1.4 年到 1.7 年不等。与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,格列本脲(美国和加拿大称为格列吡嗪)(HR 1.38,95%CI 1.27,1.50)或格列吡嗪(HR 1.55,95%CI 1.43,1.67)的死亡率风险显著升高,与罗格列酮(HR 1.27,95%CI 1.01,1.59)或格列本脲(HR 1.12,95%CI 1.02,1.23)单药治疗相比,格列吡嗪的死亡率风险也显著升高。与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,观察到性别-罗格列酮存在显著的交互作用(p=0.034),女性的 HR 更高(HR 4.36,95%CI 1.34,14.20),而男性的 HR 为 1.19(95%CI 0.95,1.49)。

结论/解释:与二甲双胍相比,格列本脲、格列吡嗪和罗格列酮的使用与更高的死亡率相关,与罗格列酮或格列本脲相比,格列吡嗪的使用与更高的死亡率相关。在解释这些结果时,应考虑到潜在的残余混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验