From the 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; 2Gynecology and Women's Health, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 3RMR Inc, Cleveland, OH; and 4University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Menopause. 2013 Oct;20(10):1098-105. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e318298debe.
Given the complexity of the literature on quality of life (QOL) and hormone therapy (HT) among women in the menopausal transition and postmenopause, the purposes of this integrative review were to (1) define QOL as a multidimensional construct; (2) review validated instruments for measurement of QOL; (3) review results of HT and QOL clinical trials that have used validated instruments; and (4) assess the effectiveness of HT on QOL, including health-related QOL (HRQOL), menopause-specific QOL (MSQOL), and global QOL (GQOL).
The literature on HT and QOL was searched for definitions of QOL and validated instruments for measuring QOL, and the results were summarized. The purposes of this integrative review were to evaluate the effects of HT on HRQOL, differentiating the effects of HT on GQOL, HRQOL, and MSQOL. As a basis for this review, we searched for published controlled clinical trials in which the effects of HT on QOL were studied using validated QOL instruments, in particular menopause-specific validated instruments.
Clear definitions are elucidated. Validated instruments for the measurements of HRQOL, GQOL, and MSQOL are summarized, and the necessity of their incorporation into future research and clinical practice is emphasized. The published effects on QOL of estrogens and progestogens administered to symptomatic and nonsymptomatic women in the menopausal transition and beyond are reviewed.
The impact of various health state-related symptoms on HRQOL and GQOL is now an integral component of contemporary health care. Effects of HT include GQOL and HRQOL and should be menopause-specific. There is clearly a need for further studies on menopause and menopause-related therapies using appropriate and validated instruments. Literature review shows that HT provides a significant benefit for MSQOL in midlife women, mainly through relief of symptoms, but treatment also may result in a global increase in sense of well-being (GQOL). HRQOL benefits are contingent on symptom status, as are MSQOL outcomes. Women who are severely symptomatic experience a significant improvement in HRQOL and MSQOL, although this improvement is not significant among women without severe symptoms at baseline measures in clinical trials.
鉴于围绝经期和绝经后女性生活质量(QOL)和激素治疗(HT)文献的复杂性,本综述的目的是:(1)将 QOL 定义为多维结构;(2)回顾用于测量 QOL 的经过验证的工具;(3)回顾使用经过验证的工具的 HT 和 QOL 临床试验结果;(4)评估 HT 对 QOL 的影响,包括健康相关 QOL(HRQOL)、特定于绝经的 QOL(MSQOL)和总体 QOL(GQOL)。
检索关于 HT 和 QOL 的文献,以确定 QOL 的定义和用于测量 QOL 的经过验证的工具,并对结果进行总结。本综述的目的是评估 HT 对 HRQOL 的影响,区分 HT 对 GQOL、HRQOL 和 MSQOL 的影响。作为本综述的基础,我们搜索了已发表的对照临床试验,这些试验使用经过验证的 QOL 工具研究了 HT 对 QOL 的影响,特别是特定于绝经的经过验证的工具。
阐述了明确的定义。总结了用于测量 HRQOL、GQOL 和 MSQOL 的经过验证的工具,并强调了将其纳入未来研究和临床实践的必要性。回顾了在围绝经期和绝经后,对有症状和无症状的女性给予雌激素和孕激素对 QOL 的影响。
各种与健康状况相关的症状对 HRQOL 和 GQOL 的影响现在是当代医疗保健的一个组成部分。HT 的影响包括 GQOL 和 HRQOL,并且应该是特定于绝经的。显然需要进一步研究使用适当和经过验证的工具进行的绝经期和与绝经期相关的治疗。文献综述表明,HT 为中年女性的 MSQOL 提供了显著的益处,主要通过缓解症状,但治疗也可能导致整体幸福感(GQOL)的提高。HRQOL 益处取决于症状状态,MSQOL 结果也是如此。在临床试验中,严重有症状的女性 HRQOL 和 MSQOL 显著改善,而基线无严重症状的女性则没有显著改善。