Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton; Ontario, Canada.
Surgery. 2013 Jul;154(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.003.
Previous studies have presented compelling data that a 1-month "boot-camp"-style course can be a highly effective mechanism for teaching and developing targeted technical skills. In the current study, we examine whether performance of these targeted skills is improved when residents are trained using directed, student-led (SL) learning methods compared with traditional instructor-led (IL) learning methods.
Twelve first-year orthopedic residents began their training with a 1-month, intensive skills course. Six residents were taught basic surgical skills using a format that focused on deliberate, SL exploration and practice of the skills under instructor supervision (SL group). The remaining residents were taught the same surgical skills using more traditional IL methods that included complete demonstration of the surgical task by an orthopedic surgeon, followed by an extended period of instruction (IL group). Performance on 4 targeted technical skills (sawing, bone drilling, suturing, and plaster splint application) was tested using an objective, structured assessment of technical skills examination for the 2 groups at the beginning and the end of the skills course.
Before the start of the skills course, there were no differences in performance scores between the 2 groups. On completion of the skills course, mean global rating scores for the 4 surgical skills tasks were greater for the SL group compared with the IL group: SL, 3.95 ± 0.1; IL, 3.42 ± 0.1; F(1,10) = 7.66 P < .02. A similar pattern of results was revealed by the checklists scores, with the SL group outperforming the IL group: SL, 94.9 ± 2.1; IL, 86.4 ± 2.1; F(1,10) = 8.512; P < .02.
Previous work has demonstrated the effectiveness of teaching basic surgical skills through an intensive course at the onset of residency. The present study shows that allowing surgical trainees to take a directed, student-regulated approach to learning basic surgical skills can further improve performance of these skills.
先前的研究已经提供了令人信服的数据,表明为期一个月的“训练营”式课程可以成为教授和发展针对性技术技能的高效机制。在当前的研究中,我们研究了当居民使用定向的、以学生为主导的(SL)学习方法与传统的以教师为主导的(IL)学习方法进行培训时,这些针对性技能的表现是否得到提高。
12 名第一年的骨科住院医师开始接受为期一个月的强化技能课程培训。六名居民采用专注于刻意的、SL 探索和在指导监督下练习技能的格式接受基本手术技能的教学(SL 组)。其余的居民则采用更传统的 IL 方法接受相同的手术技能教学,其中包括由骨科医生对手术任务进行全面演示,然后进行长时间的教学(IL 组)。在技能课程开始和结束时,使用客观的、结构化的技能评估对 2 组进行 4 项针对性技术技能(锯切、骨钻、缝合和石膏夹板应用)的测试。
在技能课程开始前,2 组的表现评分没有差异。在技能课程结束时,SL 组在 4 项手术技能任务的总体评分均高于 IL 组:SL 组,3.95±0.1;IL 组,3.42±0.1;F(1,10)=7.66,P<.02。通过检查表评分也揭示了类似的结果,SL 组的表现优于 IL 组:SL 组,94.9±2.1;IL 组,86.4±2.1;F(1,10)=8.512;P<.02。
先前的工作已经证明了在住院医师培训开始时通过强化课程教授基本手术技能的有效性。本研究表明,允许外科培训生采用定向的、以学生为中心的学习基本手术技能的方法可以进一步提高这些技能的表现。