Pandita Amrita, Jain Teerthesh, Yadav Naveen S, Feroz S M A, Diwedi Akankasha
Department of Prosthodontics, Saraswati-Dhanwantari Dental College, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Mar 1;14(2):265-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1311.
Aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate dimensional accuracy of newely introduced elastomeric impression material after repeated pours at different time intervals.
In the present study a total of 20 (10 + 10) impressions of master model were made from vinyl polyether silicone and vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Each impression was repeatedly poured at 1, 24 hours and 14 days. Therefore, a total of 60 casts were obtained. Casts obtained were scanned with three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner and measurements were done.
Vinyl polyether silicone produced overall undersized dies, with greatest change being 0.14% only after 14 days. Vinyl polysiloxane produced smaller dies after 1 and 24 hours and larger dies after 14 days, differing from master model by only 0.07% for the smallest die and to 0.02% for the largest die.
All the deviations measured from the master model with both the impression materials were within a clinically acceptable range.
In a typical fixed prosthodontic treatment accuracy of prosthesis is critical as it determines the success, failure and the prognosis of treatment including abutments. This is mainly dependent upon fit of prosthesis which in turn is dependent on dimensional accuracy of dies, poured from elastomeric impressions.
本研究的目的是比较评估新引入的弹性印模材料在不同时间间隔重复灌注后的尺寸精度。
在本研究中,用乙烯基聚醚硅酮和乙烯基聚硅氧烷印模材料制作了总共20个(10 + 10)主模型印模。每个印模在1小时、24小时和14天进行重复灌注。因此,共获得60个铸型。对获得的铸型用三维(3D)激光扫描仪进行扫描并进行测量。
乙烯基聚醚硅酮产生的铸模总体尺寸过小,仅在14天后最大变化为0.14%。乙烯基聚硅氧烷在1小时和24小时后产生较小的铸模,在14天后产生较大的铸模,最小铸模与主模型的差异仅为0.07%,最大铸模为0.02%。
两种印模材料与主模型测量的所有偏差均在临床可接受范围内。
在典型的固定义齿修复治疗中,修复体的精度至关重要,因为它决定了包括基牙在内的治疗的成功、失败和预后。这主要取决于修复体的贴合度,而修复体的贴合度又取决于从弹性印模灌注的铸模的尺寸精度。