Soganci Gokce, Cinar Duygu, Caglar Alper, Yagiz Ayberk
Department of Prosthodontics, Yildirim Beyazit University Dental School.
Department of Prosthodontics, Baskent University Dental School.
Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul 29;37(4):675-684. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-097. Epub 2018 May 31.
The aim of this study was to determine and compare the dimensional changes of polyether and vinyl polyether siloxane impression materials under immersion disinfection with two different disinfectants in three time periods. Impressions were obtained from an edentulous master model. Sodium hypochlorite (5.25%) and glutaraldehyde (2%) were used for disinfection and measurements were done 30 min later after making impression before disinfection, after required disinfection period (10 min), and after 24 h storage at room temperature. Impressions were scanned using 3D scanner with 10 microns accuracy and 3D software was used to evaluate the dimensional changes with superimpositioning. Positive and negative deviations were calculated and compared with master model. There was no significant difference between two elastomeric impression materials (p>0.05). It was concluded that dimensional accuracy and stability of two impression materials were excellent and similar.
本研究的目的是确定并比较聚醚和乙烯基聚醚硅氧烷印模材料在三种时间段内用两种不同消毒剂进行浸泡消毒后的尺寸变化。从无牙颌主模型获取印模。使用次氯酸钠(5.25%)和戊二醛(2%)进行消毒,并在消毒前取模后30分钟、所需消毒时间(10分钟)后以及在室温下储存24小时后进行测量。使用精度为10微米的3D扫描仪对印模进行扫描,并使用3D软件通过叠加来评估尺寸变化。计算正偏差和负偏差并与主模型进行比较。两种弹性体印模材料之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。得出的结论是,两种印模材料的尺寸精度和稳定性都非常好且相似。