Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
J Healthc Manag. 2013 May-Jun;58(3):225-37; discussion 238-9.
This study looks at employee information sharing among hospitals, a topic that is underresearched, underreported, and under the radar for most healthcare leaders. We initiated the research under the assumption that executives in healthcare are reluctant to share employment reference information about staff beyond the employee's name, dates of employment, and position held. We believed executives take this precaution because they fear being sued by the employee for defamation. However, not obtaining the necessary and critical information to hire a competent employee can open the potential employer up to a negligence lawsuit if it hires someone who jeopardizes the safety of patients or staff. Hence, the hiring organization faces a double-edged sword: On one side, it cannot get the critical information on a potential applicant from the previous employer due to a culture of "fear in sharing" information; on the other side, if it unwittingly hires a poor or dangerous applicant who threatens safety, it runs the risk of a negligence lawsuit for failure to ascertain information before the hire. Prior studies demonstrate that the likelihood of a successful defamation lawsuit is low and information sharing of factual incidents is unlikely to result in successful lawsuits. Why, then, are healthcare executives unwilling to provide comprehensive references when they should be aware that sustaining a culture of silence increases the potential for hiring a bad employee and seriously jeopardizes the security and safety of patients, other staff, and the public? This article's primary contribution to the literature is to offer the first nationwide study to empirically test the current levels of employee information sharing among hospitals. It is also the first study to focus exclusively on healthcare. Furthermore, this research considers factors that might influence executives in their willingness to share employee reference information. The study reveals that a culture of silence is pervasive among hospitals. Although many hospital executives are reluctant to share information, they tend to overestimate the likelihood of being sued (successfully or otherwise) by previous employees for defamation. In addition, this study shows that some hospital executives share negative information about former employees but may do so off the record.
这项研究着眼于医院之间的员工信息共享,这是一个研究不足、报道不足且大多数医疗保健领导者都没有关注的话题。我们假设医疗保健领域的高管不愿意分享员工的姓名、雇佣日期和职位等信息之外的雇佣参考信息,从而启动了这项研究。我们认为,高管之所以采取这种预防措施,是因为他们担心会被员工以诽谤为由起诉。然而,如果未能获得雇佣合格员工所需的关键信息,而潜在雇主雇佣了可能危及患者或员工安全的人员,那么潜在雇主可能会面临疏忽诉讼的风险。因此,招聘组织面临着一把双刃剑:一方面,由于“信息共享恐惧”的文化,它无法从前雇主那里获得潜在申请人的关键信息;另一方面,如果它无意中雇佣了一个威胁安全的表现不佳或危险的申请人,那么它在雇佣前未能确定信息的情况下,就有可能面临疏忽诉讼的风险。先前的研究表明,成功的诽谤诉讼的可能性很低,而且分享事实事件的信息不太可能导致成功的诉讼。那么,为什么医疗保健高管不愿意提供全面的参考资料,而他们应该意识到保持沉默的文化会增加雇佣不良员工的可能性,并严重危及患者、其他员工和公众的安全?本文对文献的主要贡献在于提供了第一项全国性研究,以实证检验医院之间员工信息共享的当前水平。它也是第一项专门关注医疗保健的研究。此外,这项研究还考虑了可能影响高管分享员工参考信息意愿的因素。研究表明,沉默的文化在医院中普遍存在。尽管许多医院高管不愿分享信息,但他们往往高估了前员工因诽谤而起诉(无论是成功还是其他方式)的可能性。此外,这项研究表明,一些医院高管会分享前员工的负面信息,但可能是在非公开场合。