• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于曲马多和蒂巴因在德国的滥用和误用潜力的专题评论。

Topical review on the abuse and misuse potential of tramadol and tilidine in Germany.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund Freud Strasse 25, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Subst Abus. 2013;34(3):313-20. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2012.735216.

DOI:10.1080/08897077.2012.735216
PMID:23844964
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tramadol and tilidine (in combination with naloxone) are used as weak opioid analgesics in Germany. Tramadol is not scheduled in the German Narcotic Drugs Act. Tilidine is scheduled, whereas Tilidine in fixed combinations with naloxone is exempt from some of the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs Act. Recent reports on misuse of both substances led to an evaluation of their potential for misuse, abuse, and dependency by the expert advisory committee established by the German Federal Government, resident at the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices.

METHODS

A subcommittee formulated key questions and identified available data sources for each of these questions. Additional information was solicited where necessary, including a survey among a panel of pharmacists, a survey in an addiction clinic, analysis of prescription patterns, and information from the boards of pharmacists of the federal states and the Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigation.

RESULTS

Analgesic efficiency in the treatment of acute and chronic pain has been proven for both tramadol and tilidine/naloxone. For tramadol, high evidence has been confirmed in systematic reviews, and tramadol is listed in national and international guidelines on acute and chronic pain management. Animal and human studies found a low potential for misuse, abuse, and dependency for both substances. Information from 2 tramadol safety databases allowed calculation of the incidence of abuse or dependency as 0.21 and 0.12 cases per million defined daily dosages (DDDs), with lower incidences in recent years. For tilidine/naloxone, the incidence was calculated as 0.43 cases per million DDDs for oral solution and 0.18 for slow-release tablets. In an online survey among German pharmacies as well as in the reports from state pharmacy boards, fraud attempts were repeated more frequently with tilidine/naloxone than with tramadol in the last 2 years. The Federal Bureau of Criminal Investigations reported prescription fraud only with tilidine/naloxone and predominantly in the region of Berlin. Dependency on tramadol or tilidine/naloxone is reported only rarely from addiction counseling centers. One third of the patients surveyed in an addiction clinic reported experiences with tramadol or tilidine/naloxone, but mostly with duration of less than 4 weeks and with a medical prescription based on a reasonable indication. Also, occasional illegal use of opioid analgesics as a substitute of heroin was reported. An evaluation of pooled data from statutory health insurance companies found 2.5% of persons receiving at least 1 prescription of tramadol or the combination of tilidine and naloxone in 2009 (1.6% with tramadol and 1.0% with tilidine/naloxone). High usage with more than 180 DDDs per year was found in 8.6% of patients treated with tramadol and 17.2% of patients with tilidine/naloxone.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the subcommittee of the expert advisory committee found a low potential for misuse, abuse, and dependency for tramadol, and a low prevalence in clinical practice. Considerable less information is available for the combination of tilidine and naloxone. However, the cumulation of evidence indicated a higher risk of misuse, abuse, and dependency for tilidine/naloxone solution, but not for slow-release tablets.

摘要

背景

曲马多和替利定(与纳洛酮联合使用)在德国被用作弱阿片类镇痛药。曲马多未列入德国《麻醉药品法》。替利定被列入管制药品,而与纳洛酮固定组合的替利定则免除了《麻醉药品法》的一些规定。最近有关这两种药物滥用的报告促使德国联邦政府设立的专家咨询委员会对它们的滥用、误用和依赖性的潜在风险进行评估,该委员会设在联邦药物和医疗器械研究所。

方法

一个小组委员会为每个问题制定了关键问题,并确定了可用的数据来源。在必要时还征求了其他信息,包括对药剂师小组进行的调查、在成瘾诊所进行的调查、处方模式分析以及来自联邦州药剂师委员会和联邦刑事警察局的信息。

结果

曲马多和替利定/纳洛酮在治疗急性和慢性疼痛方面均具有镇痛效果。曲马多在系统评价中得到了高证据的证实,并且曲马多被列入了国家和国际急性和慢性疼痛管理指南。动物和人体研究发现,这两种物质的滥用、误用和依赖性的潜在风险较低。从两个曲马多安全数据库获得的信息允许计算出滥用或依赖性的发生率为每百万规定日剂量(DDD)0.21 和 0.12 例,近年来的发生率较低。替利定/纳洛酮的发生率计算为口服溶液每百万 DDD0.43 例,缓释片每百万 DDD0.18 例。在德国药房的在线调查以及州药房委员会的报告中,在过去两年中,与曲马多相比,替利定/纳洛酮的欺诈企图更为频繁。联邦刑事警察局报告称,仅与替利定/纳洛酮有关的处方欺诈,主要发生在柏林地区。成瘾咨询中心很少报告曲马多或替利定/纳洛酮的依赖性。在一个成瘾诊所接受调查的三分之一的患者报告了使用曲马多或替利定/纳洛酮的经历,但大多持续时间不到 4 周,并且有合理适应症的医疗处方。此外,还报告了偶尔非法使用阿片类镇痛药替代海洛因的情况。对法定健康保险公司汇总数据的评估发现,2009 年至少有 1 人接受了曲马多或替利定和纳洛酮联合治疗的处方(1.6%为曲马多,1.0%为替利定/纳洛酮)。接受曲马多治疗的患者中有 8.6%和接受替利定/纳洛酮治疗的患者中有 17.2%的患者每年使用超过 180 DDD,使用率较高。

结论

总之,专家咨询委员会小组委员会发现曲马多的滥用、误用和依赖性的潜在风险较低,在临床实践中的发生率也较低。替利定和纳洛酮联合使用的信息要少得多。然而,证据的积累表明,替利定/纳洛酮溶液的滥用、误用和依赖性风险较高,而缓释片则不然。

相似文献

1
Topical review on the abuse and misuse potential of tramadol and tilidine in Germany.关于曲马多和蒂巴因在德国的滥用和误用潜力的专题评论。
Subst Abus. 2013;34(3):313-20. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2012.735216.
2
Comparison of tilidine/naloxone, tramadol and bromfenac in experimental pain: a double-blind randomized crossover study in healthy human volunteers.替利定/纳洛酮、曲马多和溴芬酸在实验性疼痛中的比较:一项针对健康人类志愿者的双盲随机交叉研究。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Aug;37(8):377-85.
3
[The transdermal 7-day buprenorphine patch--an effective and safe treatment option, if tramadol or tilidate/naloxone is insufficient. Results of a non-interventional study].[透皮7天丁丙诺啡贴剂——如果曲马多或替利定/纳洛酮疗效不足,这是一种有效且安全的治疗选择。一项非干预性研究的结果]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2010 Jul 1;152 Suppl 2:62-9.
4
Effects of tramadol and tilidine/naloxone on oral-caecal transit and pupillary light reflex.曲马多和替利定/纳洛酮对口腔至盲肠转运及瞳孔对光反射的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2000 Jan;50(1):24-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300159.
5
[Tilidine/naloxon retard in long-term administration in chronic pain and multimorbidity. Multicenter study of long-term tolerance and effectiveness in 2 years observation].[缓释替利定/纳洛酮在慢性疼痛和多种疾病中的长期给药。一项为期2年观察的长期耐受性和有效性的多中心研究]
Fortschr Med Orig. 2002;120(1):29-35.
6
[Comparison of the action of 2 effective analgesics. Experimental study: tramadol versus tilidine/naloxone].[两种有效镇痛药作用的比较。实验研究:曲马多与替利定/纳洛酮]
Fortschr Med. 1989 Jun 10;107(17):385-9.
7
[Low-dose strong opioid (LDSO)--treatment of pain in osteoarthritis].[低剂量强效阿片类药物(LDSO)——骨关节炎疼痛的治疗]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2008 Dec 11;150(51-52):41.
8
[Not to change therapy unnecessarily! Step 2 opioids at first prescription are of advantage].[不要不必要地改变治疗方案!首次处方时使用第二步阿片类药物具有优势]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2005 Nov 10;147(45):63.
9
[Chronic non-malignant pain. Opioids are also suitable for long-term treatment].[慢性非恶性疼痛。阿片类药物也适用于长期治疗]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2006 Apr 27;148(17):47.
10
[Tilidine-Naloxone sustained-release tablets for chronic pain associated with musculoskeletal disease].[替利定 - 纳洛酮缓释片用于治疗与肌肉骨骼疾病相关的慢性疼痛]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2006 Sep 14;148(37):45.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns and social factors associated with non-prescription use of Tramadol: a cross-sectional study among youth in urban informal settlements in Ghana.与曲马多非处方使用相关的模式和社会因素:加纳城市非正规住区青年的横断面研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Nov 21;43(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00688-z.
2
Misuse, Abuse and Medication Errors' Adverse Events Associated with Opioids-A Systematic Review.与阿片类药物相关的误用、滥用及用药错误不良事件——一项系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;17(8):1009. doi: 10.3390/ph17081009.
3
Tramadol for chronic pain in adults: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.
曲马多治疗成人慢性疼痛:系统评价与随机临床试验荟萃分析和序贯试验分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 22;12(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02307-0.
4
Characteristics and completeness of spontaneous reports by reporter's role in Germany: An analysis of the EudraVigilance database using the example of opioid-associated abuse, dependence, or withdrawal.德国报告人角色自发报告的特征和完整性:使用阿片类药物相关滥用、依赖或戒断的 EudraVigilance 数据库进行的分析。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023 Apr;11(2):e01077. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1077.
5
Opioid Use Associated With Higher Costs Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者使用阿片类药物与更高的费用相关。
Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Apr 14;3(2):otab021. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab021. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Enhanced Recovery After Aesthetic Breast Surgery Under Sedation, Intercostal Block and Tumescent Anaesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Early Postoperative Phase.镇静、肋间神经阻滞和肿胀麻醉下美容乳房手术后的加速康复:早期术后阶段的前瞻性队列研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Jun;47(3):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03214-w. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
A case of fatal multidrug intoxication involving flualprazolam: distribution in body fluids and solid tissues.涉及氟他唑仑的致命多药中毒案例:体液和固体组织中的分布。
Forensic Toxicol. 2022 Jan;40(1):180-188. doi: 10.1007/s11419-021-00591-w. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
Glutamatergic systems in neuropathic pain and emerging non-opioid therapies.谷氨酸能系统在神经病理性疼痛及新型非阿片类治疗中的作用。
Pharmacol Res. 2022 Nov;185:106492. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106492. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Short-term mortality following tramadol poisonings in Denmark.丹麦曲马多中毒的短期死亡率。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Jul;131(1):83-92. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13741. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia and Morphine-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.比较阿片类药物节俭的多模式镇痛与基于吗啡的患者自控镇痛在结直肠癌微创手术中的镇痛效果。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1788-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06473-5. Epub 2022 May 8.