Department of Medicine/Physiology, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland.
Front Physiol. 2013 Jul 1;4:155. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00155. eCollection 2013.
Limitations of current methods: The assessment of human variability in various compartments of daily energy expenditure (EE) under standardized conditions is well defined at rest [as basal metabolic rate (BMR) and thermic effect of feeding (TEF)], and currently under validation for assessing the energy cost of low-intensity dynamic work. However, because physical activities of daily life consist of a combination of both dynamic and isometric work, there is also a need to develop standardized tests for assessing human variability in the energy cost of low-intensity isometric work.
Development of an approach to study human variability in isometric thermogenesis by incorporating a protocol of intermittent leg press exercise of varying low-intensity isometric loads with measurements of EE by indirect calorimetry.
EE was measured in the seated position with the subject at rest or while intermittently pressing both legs against a press-platform at 5 low-intensity isometric loads (+5, +10, +15, +20, and +25 kg force), each consisting of a succession of 8 cycles of press (30 s) and rest (30 s). EE, integrated over each 8-min period of the intermittent leg press exercise, was found to increase linearly across the 5 isometric loads with a correlation coefficient (r) > 0.9 for each individual. The slope of this EE-Load relationship, which provides the energy cost of this standardized isometric exercise expressed per kg force applied intermittently (30 s in every min), was found to show good repeatability when assessed in subjects who repeated the same experimental protocol on 3 separate days: its low intra-individual coefficient of variation (CV) of ~ 10% contrasted with its much higher inter-individual CV of 35%; the latter being mass-independent but partly explained by height.
This standardized approach to study isometric thermogenesis opens up a new avenue for research in EE phenotyping and metabolic predisposition to obesity.
当前方法的局限性: 在标准条件下,对人体在不同日常能量消耗 (EE) 部位的变异性的评估在休息时得到了很好的定义 [如基础代谢率 (BMR) 和进食的热效应 (TEF)],目前正在验证评估低强度动力工作的能量消耗。 然而,由于日常生活中的体力活动由动力和等长工作的组合组成,因此还需要开发用于评估低强度等长工作能量消耗的人体变异性的标准化测试。
通过结合间歇腿部按压运动方案,开发一种研究等长产热人体变异性的方法,该方案采用不同低强度等长负荷间歇性按压腿部,通过间接测热法测量 EE。
在坐姿下,受试者处于休息状态或间歇性地将双腿压在按压平台上,施加 5 种低强度等长负荷 (+5、+10、+15、+20 和 +25 千克力) 时,测量 EE。 每个负荷都由连续 8 个按压循环 (30 秒) 和休息 (30 秒) 组成。 发现间歇腿部按压运动期间,每 8 分钟 EE 积分与 5 种等长负荷呈线性增加,个体的相关系数 (r) 均>0.9。 该 EE-负荷关系的斜率提供了按间歇施加的力 (每分钟 30 秒内每 1 千克力) 表示的这种标准化等长运动的能量消耗成本,当在 3 天内重复相同实验方案的受试者中评估时,其可重复性良好:个体内变异系数 (CV) 低 (~10%),而个体间 CV 高 (35%);后者与体重无关,但部分由身高解释。
这种研究等长产热的标准化方法为 EE 表型和肥胖代谢倾向的研究开辟了新途径。