Ashoorion Vahid, Liaghatdar Mohammad Javad, Adibi Peyman
Department of Educational Sciences, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan University, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan, Iran.
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Dec;17(12):1170-5.
Clinical reasoning is one of the most important competencies that a physician should achieve. Many medical schools and licensing bodies try to predict it based on some general measures such as critical thinking, personality, and emotional intelligence. This study aimed at providing a model to design the relationship between the constructs.
Sixty-nine medical students participated in this study. A battery test devised that consist four parts: Clinical reasoning measures, personality NEO inventory, Bar-On EQ inventory, and California critical thinking questionnaire. All participants completed the tests. Correlation and multiple regression analysis consumed for data analysis.
There is low to moderate correlations between clinical reasoning and other variables. Emotional intelligence is the only variable that contributes clinical reasoning construct (r=0.17-0.34) (R(2) chnage = 0.46, P Value = 0.000).
Although, clinical reasoning can be considered as a kind of thinking, no significant correlation detected between it and other constructs. Emotional intelligence (and its subscales) is the only variable that can be used for clinical reasoning prediction.
临床推理是医生应具备的最重要能力之一。许多医学院校和执照颁发机构试图基于批判性思维、个性和情商等一些通用指标来预测临床推理能力。本研究旨在提供一个模型来设计这些构念之间的关系。
69名医学生参与了本研究。设计了一套包含四个部分的综合测试：临床推理测量、人格新大五问卷、巴昂情商问卷和加利福尼亚批判性思维问卷。所有参与者完成了测试。采用相关性分析和多元回归分析进行数据分析。
临床推理与其他变量之间存在低到中等程度的相关性。情商是唯一对临床推理构念有贡献的变量（r = 0.17 - 0.34）（R²变化 = 0.46，P值 = 0.000）。
虽然临床推理可被视为一种思维方式，但未发现它与其他构念之间存在显著相关性。情商（及其子量表）是唯一可用于预测临床推理的变量。
