• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前漱口对减少超声洁牙器产生的气溶胶污染的效果:一项初步研究。

Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study.

作者信息

Gupta Gunjan, Mitra Dipika, Ashok K P, Gupta Arun, Soni Sweta, Ahmed Sameer, Arya Ashtha

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Vyas Dental College and Hospital, Jodhpur, India.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120616. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2013.120616
PMID:23855840
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aerosol generated by an ultrasonic scaler contains microorganisms that can penetrate into the body through the respiratory system of dental surgeons and patients. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of commercially available preprocedural mouthrinses containing 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, an herbal mouthwash, and water in reducing the levels of viable bacteria in aerosols.

METHODS

This single-center, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized, three-group parallel design was conducted over a period of 45 days. Twenty-four patients with chronic periodontitis were divided randomly into three groups (A, B, and C) of eight patients each to receive 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, herbal mouthwash, and water, respectively, as a preprocedural rinse. The aerosol produced by the ultrasonic unit was collected at patient's chest area, doctor's chest area, and assistant's chest area on blood agar plates in all three groups. The blood agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours, and the total number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was counted and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The results showed that CFUs in groups A and B were significantly reduced compared with group C, P <0.001 (analysis of variance). Also, CFUs in group A were significantly reduced compared with group B, P <0.05 (independent t-test). The numbers of CFUs were highest at the patient's chest area and lowest at the assistant's chest area.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a routine preprocedural mouthrinse could eliminate the majority of bacterial aerosols generated by the use of an ultrasonic unit, and that 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate is more effective than herbal mouthwash.

摘要

背景

超声洁牙机产生的气溶胶含有微生物,可通过牙科医生和患者的呼吸系统进入体内。本初步研究的目的是评估和比较含0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定的市售前程序漱口水、草药漱口水和水在降低气溶胶中活菌水平方面的效果。

方法

本研究采用单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、三组平行设计,为期45天。24例慢性牙周炎患者随机分为三组(A组、B组和C组),每组8例,分别接受0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定、草药漱口水和水作为前程序漱口水。在所有三组中,将超声设备产生的气溶胶收集在患者胸部区域、医生胸部区域和助手胸部区域的血琼脂平板上。血琼脂平板在37°C下孵育48小时,计算菌落形成单位(CFU)总数并进行统计分析。

结果

结果显示,与C组相比,A组和B组的CFU显著降低,P<0.001(方差分析)。此外,与B组相比,A组的CFU显著降低,P<0.05(独立t检验)。CFU数量在患者胸部区域最高,在助手胸部区域最低。

结论

本研究表明,常规的前程序漱口水可以消除使用超声设备产生的大部分细菌气溶胶,并且0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定比草药漱口水更有效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study.术前漱口对减少超声洁牙器产生的气溶胶污染的效果:一项初步研究。
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120616. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
2
Compare the effcacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse.比较两种市售漱口水在用作术前冲洗时,减少超声洁牙过程中产生的牙科气溶胶中活菌数的效果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):848-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1414.
3
A study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinsing and high volume evacuator attachment alone and in combination in reducing the amount of viable aerosols produced during ultrasonic scaling procedure.一项评估和比较术前漱口和单独及联合使用高容量吸引器附件在减少超声洁牙过程中产生的可存活气溶胶量方面的疗效的研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Sep 1;13(5):681-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1209.
4
Efficacy of preprocedural rinsing with an antiseptic in reducing viable bacteria in dental aerosols.术前用抗菌剂冲洗对减少牙科气溶胶中活菌的效果。
J Periodontol. 1992 Oct;63(10):821-4. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.10.821.
5
Efficacy of Preprocedural Boric Acid Mouthrinse in Reducing Viable Bacteria in Dental Aerosols Produced during Ultrasonic Scaling.术前使用硼酸漱口水对减少超声洁牙过程中产生的牙科气溶胶中活菌的效果。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):282-288. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_374_20. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Effectiveness of a pre-procedural mouthwash in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols: randomized clinical trial.术前含漱液减少牙科气溶胶中细菌的有效性:随机临床试验
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Mar 30;31:e21. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0021.
7
Efficacy of Combining an Extraoral High-Volume Evacuator with Preprocedural Mouth Rinsing in Reducing Aerosol Contamination Produced by Ultrasonic Scaling.超声洁治时使用口外抽吸器联合术前漱口对降低气溶胶污染的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 16;19(10):6048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106048.
8
The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office.术前使用含有氯己定的漱口液在减少牙科诊室细菌方面的效果。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr;141(4):415-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0193.
9
Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures.脱粘过程中气溶胶污染的评估。
Angle Orthod. 2001 Aug;71(4):299-306. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0299:EOACDD>2.0.CO;2.
10
Effects of preprocedural mouth rinse on microbial load in aerosols produced during the ultrasonic scaling: A randomized controlled trial.术前漱口对超声洁治过程中产生的气溶胶中微生物负荷的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Sep-Oct;26(5):478-484. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_281_21. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinses (Chlorhexidine, essential oil, and hydrogen peroxide) in reducing bacterial aerosols during dental scaling.术前漱口液(氯己定、精油和过氧化氢)在减少洗牙过程中细菌气溶胶方面的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1004. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06308-4.
2
Investigating the effectiveness of commercially available mouthwash on SARS-CoV-2 in vivo using viable virus titre as the primary outcome. A randomised controlled trial.以活病毒滴度作为主要指标,研究市售漱口水对新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的体内有效性。一项随机对照试验。
Access Microbiol. 2024 Jul 8;6(7). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000722.v3. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce aerosol generation in dental environments: A systematic review.
牙科环境中减少气溶胶产生的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 25;35:102383. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102383. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Three Different Mouthwashes on Periodontal Pathogens-An Study.三种不同漱口水对牙周病原体的抗菌效果——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S459-S462. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_612_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
Evaluating the microbial aerosol generated by dental instruments: addressing new challenges for oral healthcare in the hospital infection.评估牙科器械产生的微生物气溶胶:应对医院感染中口腔保健的新挑战。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03109-5.
6
Evaluation of effects of essential oil vapors on the bacterial count in bioaerosols.评估香精油蒸汽对生物气溶胶中细菌数量的影响。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4):601. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_279_21. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
7
Tracing ΦX174 bacteriophage spreading during aerosol-generating procedures in a dental clinic.追踪 ΦX174 噬菌体在牙科诊所产生气溶胶的过程中的传播。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):3221-3231. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04937-z. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
8
Efficacy of chlorhexidine/herbal formulation for microbial reduction in aerosol generated following ultrasonic scaling - A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.洗必泰/草药配方在减少超声洁治产生的气溶胶中微生物方面的疗效——一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;27(1):82-86. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_478_21. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
9
Effects of preprocedural mouth rinse on microbial load in aerosols produced during the ultrasonic scaling: A randomized controlled trial.术前漱口对超声洁治过程中产生的气溶胶中微生物负荷的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Sep-Oct;26(5):478-484. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_281_21. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Preprocedural mouth rinses for preventing transmission of infectious diseases through aerosols in dental healthcare providers.口腔预处理冲洗液在预防牙科医护人员通过气溶胶传播传染性疾病中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013826.pub2.