G.F. Strong Rehab Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Aug;28(5):485-91. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act023.
Ethnically diverse examinees tend to perform lower on neuropsychological tests. The practice of adjusting normative comparisons for the education level and/or race to prevent overpathologizing low scores is problematic. Education quality, as measured by reading recognition, appears to be a more accurate benchmark for premorbid functioning in certain populations. The present study aimed to extend this line of research to traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that a measure of reading recognition, the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR), would account for racial differences in neuropsychological performance after TBI. Fifty participants (72% African American, 28% Caucasian) with moderate to severe TBI underwent neuropsychological testing at 1-year post-injury. Reading recognition accounted for all the same variance in neuropsychological performance as race and education (together), as well as considerable additional variance. Estimation of premorbid functioning in African Americans with TBI could be refined by considering reading recognition.
族裔多样化的考生在神经心理学测试中往往表现不佳。为了防止对低分数过度病理化,调整与教育水平和/或种族有关的规范比较的做法存在问题。阅读识别等教育质量指标,似乎是某些人群中更准确的发病前功能基准。本研究旨在将这一研究方向扩展到创伤性脑损伤 (TBI)。我们假设,阅读识别的一种衡量标准,即韦氏成人阅读测验 (WTAR),将解释 TBI 后神经心理学表现中的种族差异。50 名参与者(72%为非裔美国人,28%为白种人)在 TBI 后 1 年接受了神经心理学测试。阅读识别解释了神经心理学表现中种族和教育(共同)以及相当多的其他差异所产生的所有相同方差。通过考虑阅读识别,可以更精确地估计患有 TBI 的非裔美国人的发病前功能。