Haig Brian D
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Am J Psychol. 2013 Summer;126(2):135-53. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135.
For more than 50 years, psychology has been dominated by a top-down research strategy in which a simplistic account of the hypothetico-deductive method is paired with null hypothesis testing in order to test hypotheses and theories. As a consequence of this focus on testing, psychologists have failed to pay sufficient attention to a complementary, bottom-up research strategy in which data-to-theory research is properly pursued.This bottom-up strategy has 2 primary aspects: the detection of phenomena, mostly in the form of empirical generalizations, and the subsequent understanding of those phenomena through the abductive generation of explanatory theories. This article provides a methodologically informative account of phenomena detection with reference to psychology. It begins by presenting the important distinctions between data, phenomena, and theory. It then identifies a number of different methodological strategies that are used to identify empirical phenomena. Thereafter, it discusses aspects of the nature of science that are prompted by a consideration of the distinction between data, phenomena, and explanatory theory. Taken together, these considerations press for significant changes in the way we think about and practice psychological research. The adoption of these changes would help psychology correct a number of its major current research deficiencies.
五十多年来,心理学一直被一种自上而下的研究策略所主导,在这种策略中,对假设演绎法的简单描述与零假设检验相结合,以检验假设和理论。由于专注于检验,心理学家未能对一种互补的、自下而上的研究策略给予足够关注,而在这种自下而上的研究策略中,数据到理论的研究得到了恰当的推进。这种自下而上的策略有两个主要方面:现象的发现,主要是以经验概括的形式,以及随后通过溯因生成解释性理论来理解这些现象。本文提供了一种关于心理学现象发现的具有方法论指导意义的阐述。文章首先介绍了数据、现象和理论之间的重要区别。然后,它确定了一些用于识别经验现象的不同方法论策略。此后,它讨论了考虑数据、现象和解释性理论之间的区别所引发的科学本质的各个方面。综合起来,这些思考促使我们在思考和实践心理学研究的方式上做出重大改变。采用这些改变将有助于心理学纠正其当前的一些主要研究缺陷。