Suppr超能文献

北卡罗来纳州皮埃特县健康街角商店计划的形成性评价:为健康街角商店计划吸引利益相关者,第 2 部分。

Formative evaluation for a healthy corner store initiative in Pitt County, North Carolina: engaging stakeholders for a healthy corner store initiative, part 2.

机构信息

East Carolina University, Department of Public Health, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Jul 18;10:E120. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120319.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We examined the feasibility of increasing access to healthful food in corner stores to inform a Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) initiative by engaging stakeholders (corner store owners and customers) in a formative evaluation.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with corner store owners and managers (n = 11). Customer intercept surveys (n = 179) were also conducted with customers of 9 stores. Corner stores were located in rural food deserts (municipalities without a chain supermarket) and in low-income, urban municipalities in eastern North Carolina. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and double-coded. Qualitative themes related to feasibility of increasing access to healthful foods were extracted. Shopping patterns of rural and urban customers were compared by using t tests.

RESULTS

Corner store owners were willing to stock more healthful foods, but they perceived that customer demand for these foods was low. Rural customers reported more frequently shopping at corner stores than urban customers and more frequently stated that the reason they do not eat more fruits and vegetables is that the stores in which they shop do not sell them. Most customers reported they would be very or somewhat likely to purchase fresh produce at a corner store.

CONCLUSION

Corner stores may be an important source of food for rural and low-income residents and thus a good place in which to intervene. The results of this formative evaluation were used to plan and evaluate a CPPW healthy corner store initiative.

摘要

简介

我们通过让利益相关者(街角商店店主和顾客)参与形成性评估,研究了增加在街角商店购买健康食品的机会的可行性,以推动“社区预防行动计划”(CPPW)。

方法

对 9 家商店的 11 名街角商店店主和经理进行了定性访谈。还对 179 名顾客进行了顾客拦截调查。这些街角商店位于农村食品荒漠(没有连锁超市的城市)和北卡罗来纳州东部低收入城市。访谈逐字转录并进行了双重编码。提取了与增加健康食品供应可行性相关的定性主题。使用 t 检验比较了农村和城市顾客的购物模式。

结果

街角商店店主愿意增加更多健康食品的库存,但他们认为顾客对这些食品的需求很低。农村顾客比城市顾客更频繁地在街角商店购物,并且更频繁地表示他们不吃更多水果和蔬菜的原因是他们购物的商店不销售这些食品。大多数顾客表示,他们非常或有些可能会在街角商店购买新鲜农产品。

结论

街角商店可能是农村和低收入居民的重要食物来源,因此是一个很好的干预地点。这项形成性评估的结果被用于计划和评估 CPPW 健康街角商店计划。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
A Mixed Methods Comparison of Urban and Rural Retail Corner Stores.城乡零售街角商店的混合方法比较
AIMS Public Health. 2015 Aug 26;2(3):554-582. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.3.554. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验