Suppr超能文献

4 种不同补充剂和 5 种血培养瓶类型在模拟无菌体液培养中对细菌和念珠菌属的检测性能。

The performance of 4 different supplements and 5 blood culture bottles types in detection of bacteria and Candida spp. in simulated sterile body fluid cultures.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Microbiology F72, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, SE 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;77(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of 4 supplements: horse blood, fastidious organisms supplement (FOS), haemin isovitalex albumine (HIA), and brain heart infusion-haemin isovitalex albumine (BHI-HIA) and 5 blood culture bottles: Bactec Mycosis IC/F, Plus Aerobic/F, Peds Plus/F from the Bactec 9240 system, and BacT/Alert FA and BacT/Alert PF from the BacT/Alert 3D system, in detection of bacteria and Candida spp. in simulated sterile body fluids other than blood models. In total, 8 reference strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, Candida albicans, and Candida parapsilosis) and 11 clinical bacteria and yeast isolates (6 isolates from cerebrospinal fluid and 5 isolates from blood) were included in this study. Horse blood, FOS, and HIA were significantly better than no supplements (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0002, and P = 0.05, respectively) in detection of bacteria. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between BHI-HIA and bottles without any supplements. Sixty bottles analyzed of which 59 (98.33%) bottles with horse blood, 53 (88.33%) with FOS, 45 (75.00%) with HIA, and 43 (71.67%) with BHI-HIA signaled positive. The positivity rates with horse blood were significantly higher than with HIA and BHI-HIA (P < 0.0005 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Similarly, the blood culture bottles with horse blood had shorter time to detection (TTD) compared to bottles with FOS and HIA (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). When yeasts were analyzed, almost all (124/125) blood culture bottles with Candida spp. signaled positive even in the absence of supplements. Bactec Mycosis IC/F had significantly shorter TTD compared to Bactec Peds Plus/F, Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, BacT/Alert FA, and BacT/Alert PF bottles in detection of Candida spp. (P < 0.005, P < 0.05, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The present study showed that horse blood was the most effective supplement in growth of bacteria in the blood culture bottles that were analyzed in the study.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 4 种补充剂(马血、难培养菌补充剂、血红素异戊烯醇白蛋白、脑心浸液-血红素异戊烯醇白蛋白)和 5 种血培养瓶(Bactec Mycosis IC/F、Bactec Plus Aerobic/F、Bactec Peds Plus/F、BacT/Alert FA 和 BacT/Alert PF)在模拟非血液无菌体液中对细菌和念珠菌属的检测性能。共纳入 8 株参考菌株(金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌、脑膜炎奈瑟菌、流感嗜血杆菌、单核细胞增生李斯特菌、白色念珠菌和近平滑念珠菌)和 11 株临床细菌和酵母分离株(6 株来自脑脊液,5 株来自血液)。马血、FOS 和 HIA 在检测细菌方面明显优于无补充剂(P<0.0001、P<0.0002 和 P=0.05)。有趣的是,BHI-HIA 与无任何补充剂的瓶之间没有显著差异。分析了 60 个培养瓶,其中 59 个(98.33%)马血培养瓶、53 个(88.33%)FOS 培养瓶、45 个(75.00%)HIA 培养瓶和 43 个(71.67%)BHI-HIA 培养瓶信号阳性。马血的阳性率明显高于 HIA 和 BHI-HIA(P<0.0005 和 P<0.0001)。同样,与 FOS 和 HIA 相比,含有马血的血培养瓶具有更短的检测时间(TTD)(P<0.05 和 P<0.0001)。当分析酵母时,即使没有补充剂,几乎所有(125 株中的 124 株)含念珠菌属的血培养瓶均呈阳性。与 Bactec Peds Plus/F、Bactec Plus Aerobic/F、BacT/Alert FA 和 BacT/Alert PF 瓶相比,Bactec Mycosis IC/F 检测念珠菌属的 TTD 显著缩短(P<0.005、P<0.05、P<0.001 和 P<0.001)。本研究表明,在本研究分析的血培养瓶中,马血是最有效的细菌生长补充剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验