Gardner Benjamin, Tang Vinca
Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):258-73. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12060. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
Within health psychology, habit - the tendency to enact action automatically as a learned response to contextual cues - is most commonly quantified using the 'Self-Report Habit Index', which assesses behavioural automaticity, or measures combining self-reported behaviour frequency and context stability. Yet, the use of self-report to capture habit has proven controversial. This study used 'think-aloud' methods to investigate problems experienced when completing these two measures.
Cross-sectional survey with think-aloud study.
Twenty student participants narrated their thoughts while completing habit measures applied to four health-related behaviours (active commuting, unhealthy snacking, and one context-free and one context-specific variant of alcohol consumption). Data were coded using thematic analysis procedures.
Problems were found in 10% of responses. Notable findings included participants lacking confidence in reporting automaticity, struggling to recall behaviour or cues, differing in interpretations of 'commuting', and misinterpreting items.
While most responses were unproblematic, and further work is needed to investigate habit self-reports among larger and more diverse samples, findings nonetheless question the sensitivity of the measures, and the conceptualization of habit underpinning common applications of them. We offer suggestions to minimize these problems. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Habit is most commonly measured within health psychology via the Self-Report Habit Index, or a combination of self-reported behaviour frequency and contextual stability. The suitability of self-report for capturing automatic processes has been questioned. What does this study add? This is the first study of how people interpret and respond to self-report habit measures. Results show the potential for errors in recalling automaticity, cues, and behaviours. We discuss practical and theoretical challenges to assessing habit in health behaviours.
在健康心理学领域,习惯——即作为对情境线索的习得反应而自动执行行为的倾向——最常通过“自我报告习惯指数”进行量化,该指数评估行为的自动性,或结合自我报告的行为频率和情境稳定性的测量方法。然而,使用自我报告来捕捉习惯已被证明存在争议。本研究采用“出声思考”方法来调查完成这两项测量时遇到的问题。
带有出声思考研究的横断面调查。
20名学生参与者在完成适用于四种与健康相关行为(主动通勤、不健康零食以及一种无情境和一种特定情境的饮酒变体)的习惯测量时讲述他们的想法。数据使用主题分析程序进行编码。
在10%的回答中发现了问题。显著发现包括参与者在报告自动性方面缺乏信心、难以回忆行为或线索、对“通勤”的解释存在差异以及对项目的误解。
虽然大多数回答没有问题,并且需要进一步开展工作以在更大且更多样化的样本中调查习惯自我报告,但研究结果仍然对这些测量方法的敏感性以及支撑其常见应用的习惯概念化提出了质疑。我们提供了将这些问题最小化的建议。贡献声明关于该主题已知的内容有哪些?在健康心理学中,习惯最常通过自我报告习惯指数或自我报告的行为频率与情境稳定性的组合来测量。自我报告对于捕捉自动过程的适用性受到了质疑。本研究增加了什么内容?这是第一项关于人们如何解释和回应自我报告习惯测量的研究。结果显示在回忆自动性、线索和行为方面存在出错的可能性。我们讨论了评估健康行为中习惯的实际和理论挑战。