State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Jul 11;7(7):e2294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002294. Print 2013.
Rabies remains a serious problem in China with three epidemics since 1949 and the country in the midst of the third epidemic. Significantly, the control of each outbreak has been followed by a rapid reemergence of the disease. In 2005, the government implemented a rabies national surveillance program that included the collection and screening of almost 8,000 samples. In this work, we analyzed a Chinese dataset comprising 320 glycoprotein sequences covering 23 provinces and eight species, spanning the second and third epidemics. Specifically, we investigated whether the three epidemics are associated with a single reemerging lineage or a different lineage was responsible for each epidemic. Consistent with previous results, phylogenetic analysis identified six lineages, China I to VI. Analysis of the geographical composition of these lineages revealed they are consistent with human case data and reflect the gradual emergence of China I in the third epidemic. Initially, China I was restricted to south China and China II was dominant. However, as the epidemic began to spread into new areas, China I began to emerge, whereas China II remained confined to south China. By the latter part of the surveillance period, almost all isolates were China I and contributions from the remaining lineages were minimal. The prevalence of China II in the early stages of the third epidemic and its established presence in wildlife suggests that it too replaced a previously dominant lineage during the second epidemic. This lineage replacement may be a consequence of control programs that were dominated by dog culling efforts as the primary control method in the first two epidemics. This had the effect of reducing dominant strains to levels comparable with other localized background stains. Our results indicate the importance of effective control strategies for long term control of the disease.
狂犬病仍然是中国的一个严重问题,自 1949 年以来发生了三次疫情,目前正处于第三次疫情之中。值得注意的是,每次疫情的控制都伴随着疾病的迅速再次出现。2005 年,政府实施了狂犬病国家监测计划,包括收集和筛选近 8000 个样本。在这项工作中,我们分析了一个包含 320 个糖蛋白序列的中国数据集,涵盖了 23 个省份和 8 个物种,跨越了第二和第三次疫情。具体来说,我们调查了这三次疫情是否与单一的再出现谱系有关,或者是否有不同的谱系负责每次疫情。与先前的结果一致,系统发育分析确定了六个谱系,中国 I 到 VI。对这些谱系的地理组成分析表明,它们与人类病例数据一致,并反映了中国 I 在第三次疫情中的逐渐出现。最初,中国 I 局限于华南地区,而中国 II 则占主导地位。然而,随着疫情开始向新地区传播,中国 I 开始出现,而中国 II 仍然局限于华南地区。在监测期的后期,几乎所有的分离株都是中国 I,其余谱系的贡献微不足道。中国 II 在第三次疫情早期的流行及其在野生动物中的存在表明,它也在第二次疫情中取代了以前的主导谱系。这种谱系替代可能是由于控制计划主导的犬只捕杀作为前两次疫情的主要控制方法,将优势菌株减少到与其他局部背景菌株相当的水平。我们的研究结果表明,有效的控制策略对于长期控制疾病至关重要。