• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床实践中实施常规结果监测:益处、挑战与解决方案。

Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: benefits, challenges, and solutions.

作者信息

Boswell James F, Kraus David R, Miller Scott D, Lambert Michael J

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University at Albany, State University of New York , Albany , NY , USA.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):6-19. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.817696. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696
PMID:23885809
Abstract

This article reviews the benefits, obstacles, and challenges that can hinder (and have hindered) implementation of routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice. Recommendations for future routine outcome assessment efforts are also provided. Spanning three generations, as well as multiple developed tools and approaches, the four authors of this article have spent much of their careers working to address these issues and attempt to consolidate this learning and experience briefly here. Potential "elephants in the room" are brought into the discussion wherever relevant, rather than leaving them to obstruct silently the field's efforts. Some of these topics have been largely ignored, yet must be addressed if we are to fulfill our promise of integrating science and practice. This article is an attempt to identify these important issues and start an honest and open dialogue.

摘要

本文回顾了在临床实践中可能阻碍(以及已经阻碍)常规结果监测实施的益处、障碍和挑战。还提供了对未来常规结果评估工作的建议。本文的四位作者跨越了三代人,涉及多种已开发的工具和方法,他们职业生涯的大部分时间都致力于解决这些问题,并试图在此简要整合这些知识和经验。只要相关,文中就会讨论潜在的“棘手问题”,而不是任由它们默默阻碍该领域的努力。其中一些主题在很大程度上被忽视了,但如果我们要兑现整合科学与实践的承诺,就必须加以解决。本文旨在识别这些重要问题并开启一场坦诚开放的对话。

相似文献

1
Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: benefits, challenges, and solutions.在临床实践中实施常规结果监测:益处、挑战与解决方案。
Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):6-19. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.817696. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
2
The treatment outcome package: facilitating practice and clinically relevant research.治疗结果套餐:促进实践和临床相关研究。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012 Jun;49(2):115-22. doi: 10.1037/a0027932.
3
Implementing an aim-based outcome measure in a psychoanalytic child psychotherapy service: insights, experiences and evidence.在精神分析儿童心理治疗服务中实施基于目标的结果测量:见解、经验与证据。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;19(2):169-83. doi: 10.1177/1359104513485081. Epub 2013 May 9.
4
Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go?心理治疗中以患者为中心的研究与反馈研究:我们现状如何,又将何去何从?
Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):625-32. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1079661. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Developing practice-based evidence: benefits, challenges, and tensions.发展基于实践的证据:益处、挑战与矛盾
Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):20-31. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.861093. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
6
Enhancing the hermeneutic single-case efficacy design: Bridging the research-practice gap.加强诠释性单病例疗效设计:弥合研究与实践的差距。
Psychother Res. 2017 Sep;27(5):539-548. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1136441. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Practice research network in a psychology training clinic: building an infrastructure to foster early attachment to the scientific-practitioner model.心理学培训诊所中的实践研究网络:构建一种基础设施以促进对科学从业者模式的早期认同。
Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):52-66. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.856045. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
8
The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting.在挪威实施结果问卷-45.2反馈系统的效果:自然环境下的多中心随机临床试验。
Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):669-77. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2014.928756. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
9
Practice-oriented research: what it takes to do collaborative research in private practice.以实践为导向的研究:在私人诊所开展合作研究所需的条件。
Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):67-83. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2014.939119. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
10
Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychiatric rehabilitation services in Israel.在以色列的精神康复服务中实施常规结果测量。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(4):345-53. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1025722. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing Measurement-Based Care for Youth in an Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic: The Penn State Psychiatry Clinical Assessment and Rating Evaluation System for Youth (PCARES-Youth).在门诊精神病诊所为青少年建立基于测量的护理:宾夕法尼亚州立大学青少年精神病临床评估与评级评估系统(PCARES-Youth)。
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020;5(1):67-82. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2020.1727795. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Development and usability testing of an online platform for provider training and implementation of cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help for eating disorders.一个用于提供者培训以及实施饮食失调认知行为疗法引导自助的在线平台的开发与可用性测试。
BMC Digit Health. 2025;3(1). doi: 10.1186/s44247-024-00140-6. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
The Critical Role and Effects of Patient-Centered Communication in Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review.以患者为中心的沟通在心理治疗中的关键作用及影响:一项叙述性综述
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Aug 5;18:1657-1671. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S528343. eCollection 2025.
4
Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.让有心理障碍亲身经历的人参与进来:心理学领域社区参与式测量发展的当前研究与未来方向。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;13(4):720-739. doi: 10.1177/21677026241304339. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Personalised and precision mental health in eating disorders: why routine outcome measurement is key.饮食失调中的个性化与精准心理健康:为何常规结果测量至关重要。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 10;13(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01290-2.
6
Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals Towards the Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Settings: A Thematic Analysis.心理健康专业人员对在住院心理治疗环境中使用常规结果监测的态度:一项主题分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01455-w.
7
Collaboration for Recovery: Expert Mental Health Worker Experiences with the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domain and Stages (RAS-DS).康复协作:心理健康专家使用康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS - DS)的经验
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01476-7.
8
Who defines improvement? Patients' global reports of improvement compared to standardized measures of improvement in cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.谁来定义改善?与创伤后应激障碍认知加工疗法改善的标准化测量相比,患者对改善的总体报告。
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Jul;113:103027. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103027. Epub 2025 May 14.
9
Medical preparedness for bioterrorism and chemical warfare: A public health integration review.针对生物恐怖主义和化学战的医疗准备:一项公共卫生整合综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 2;104(18):e42289. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042289.
10
Patients' experiences with the routine use of a clinical feedback system prior to consultations in ostomy care: a qualitative study.造口护理咨询前常规使用临床反馈系统的患者体验:一项定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 May;34(5):1473-1482. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03916-z. Epub 2025 Feb 15.