• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与单纯节段性物理康复相比,高功率激光疗法治疗涉及肌肉和韧带的挥鞭伤(魁北克工作组分类的1°和2°级)。

High power laser therapy treatment compared to simple segmental physical rehabilitation in whiplash injuries (1° and 2° grade of the Quebec Task Force classification) involving muscles and ligaments.

作者信息

Conforti Maria, Fachinetti Giorgio Paolo

机构信息

Direzione Generale INAIL, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013 Jul 9;3(2):106-11. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2013.3.2.106. Print 2013 Apr.

DOI:10.11138/mltj/2013.3.2.106
PMID:23888293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3711700/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

whiplash is a frequent post traumatic pathology caused by muscle, tendon and capsular elements over stretching. The authors conducted a short term prospective randomised study to test the effectiveness of a multi wave High Power Laser Therapy (HPLT) versus conventional simple segmental physical rehabilitation (PT) included in Italian tariff nomenclature performance physiotherapy Study Design: prospective randomised study (Level II).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

the authors identified 135 homogeneous patients with whiplash grade 1 - 2 of the Quebec Task Force classification (QTFC). INAIL, the Italian National Workers Insurance, based in Milan, was reliable source for identifying patients. All patients with whiplash injuries grade 1 or 2 QTFC, were eligible for the study, starting from April 28 2010 to September 30 2010. Patients referred to a Coordinator (C.M.) who applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Dates for initial treatment session were arranged, including cervical spine X-ray, and assessment. Each patient gave informed consent for participation and agreed to adopt only the study treatment for 6 weeks. Group A (84 patients) was treated with High Power Laser Therapy (HPLT), Group B (51 patients) received conventional simple segmental physical rehabilitation (PT). During the treatment period, no other electro-medical therapy, analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs were allowed. All patients were assessed at baseline (T0) and at the end of the treatment period (T1) using a Visual Analogical Scale (VAS), (T2) the date of return to work was registered afterwards.

RESULTS

there was a reduction in VAS pain scores at T1. Group A (VAS = 20) Group B (VAS = 34,8) (p =0.0048). Laser treatment allowed quick recovery and return to work (T2). Group A after 48 days against 66 days of Group B (p=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

results suggest that High Power Laser Therapy - is an effective treatment in patients with whiplash injury, compared to conventional simple segmental physical rehabilitation.

摘要

引言

挥鞭样损伤是一种常见的创伤后病理状态,由肌肉、肌腱和关节囊过度拉伸引起。作者进行了一项短期前瞻性随机研究,以测试多波高功率激光疗法(HPLT)与意大利收费标准中包含的传统简单节段性物理康复(PT)的疗效。研究设计:前瞻性随机研究(二级)。

材料与方法

作者确定了135例魁北克工作组分类(QTFC)为1-2级的挥鞭样损伤的同质患者。位于米兰的意大利国家工伤保险公司(INAIL)是识别患者的可靠来源。所有QTFC为1级或2级挥鞭样损伤患者均符合研究条件,从2010年4月28日至2010年9月30日。患者被转介给一名协调员(C.M.),由其应用纳入和排除标准。同意参与的患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一。安排了初始治疗 session 的日期,包括颈椎X光检查和评估。每位患者均签署了知情同意书,并同意在6周内仅采用研究治疗方法。A组(84例患者)接受高功率激光疗法(HPLT)治疗,B组(51例患者)接受传统简单节段性物理康复(PT)治疗。在治疗期间,不允许使用其他电疗、镇痛药或抗炎药。所有患者在基线(T0)和治疗期结束时(T1)使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估,之后记录(T2)重返工作岗位的日期。

结果

T1时VAS疼痛评分降低。A组(VAS = 20),B组(VAS = 34.8)(p = 0.0048)。激光治疗使恢复加快并能重返工作岗位(T2)。A组为48天,而B组为66天(p = 0.0005)。

结论

结果表明,与传统简单节段性物理康复相比,高功率激光疗法对挥鞭样损伤患者是一种有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
High power laser therapy treatment compared to simple segmental physical rehabilitation in whiplash injuries (1° and 2° grade of the Quebec Task Force classification) involving muscles and ligaments.与单纯节段性物理康复相比,高功率激光疗法治疗涉及肌肉和韧带的挥鞭伤(魁北克工作组分类的1°和2°级)。
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013 Jul 9;3(2):106-11. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2013.3.2.106. Print 2013 Apr.
2
Managing Injuries of the Neck Trial (MINT): a randomised controlled trial of treatments for whiplash injuries.颈部损伤管理试验(MINT):一项针对挥鞭样损伤治疗的随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(49):iii-iv, 1-141. doi: 10.3310/hta16490.
3
StressModEx--Physiotherapist-led Stress Inoculation Training integrated with exercise for acute whiplash injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.应激模式训练——由物理治疗师主导的应激接种训练与运动相结合用于急性挥鞭伤:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):157. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
Trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy and exercise for chronic whiplash: protocol of a randomised, controlled trial.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法与运动治疗慢性挥鞭伤:一项随机对照试验方案
J Physiother. 2015 Oct;61(4):218. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Grade II whiplash injuries to the neck: what is the benefit for patients treated by different physical therapy modalities?颈部二级挥鞭伤:不同物理治疗方式对患者有何益处?
Patient Saf Surg. 2009 Jan 16;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-3-2.
6
A small group Whiplash-Associated-Disorders (WAD) patients with central neck pain and movement induced stabbing pain, the painful segment determined by mechanical provocation: Fusion surgery was superior to multimodal rehabilitation in a randomized trial.一小群患有颈部挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)且伴有颈部中央疼痛和运动诱发刺痛的患者,疼痛节段由机械性激发试验确定:在一项随机试验中,融合手术优于多模式康复治疗。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Jul;12:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Comparison of the relative benefits of 2 versus 10 days of soft collar cervical immobilization after acute whiplash injury.急性挥鞭伤后使用软颈托固定2天与10天的相对益处比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;87(11):1423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.268.
8
What factors have influence on persistence of neck pain after a whiplash?哪些因素会影响挥鞭样损伤后颈痛的持续时间?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9):E338-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c9b075.
9
Therapy recommendation "act as usual" in patients with whiplash injuries QTF I°.对于挥鞭样损伤QTF I°患者的治疗建议为“照常生活”。
Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Aug 20;4(6):36-42. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n6p36.
10
Whiplash injuries in Finland: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.芬兰的挥鞭伤:一项为期1年的前瞻性随访研究。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 May-Jun;20(3):399-402.

引用本文的文献

1
The comparison of the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of de Quervain tenosynovitis.体外冲击波疗法与高强度激光疗法治疗桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎的疗效比较。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 31;71(1):28-36. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.14671. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the management of neck pain.一项关于高强度激光治疗颈部疼痛管理效果的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 May 6;39(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04069-0.
3
Effectiveness of Interventions on Work Outcomes After Road Traffic Crash-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.道路交通碰撞相关肌肉骨骼损伤后干预措施对工作成果的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Mar;35(1):30-47. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10185-z. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
High-Intensity Laser Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.高强度激光疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疾病:随机临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 13;12(4):1479. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041479.
5
TECAR Therapy Associated with High-Intensity Laser Therapy (Hilt) and Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Muscle Disorders: A Literature Review on the Theorised Effects Supporting Their Use.TECAR疗法联合高强度激光疗法(Hilt)及手法治疗在肌肉疾病治疗中的应用:关于支持其使用的理论效应的文献综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 19;11(20):6149. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206149.
6
Using Short Term of High Power Laser Therapy in Horse's Tendon Injuries.应用短期大强度激光疗法治疗马的腱部损伤。
Arch Razi Inst. 2021 Nov 30;76(5):1437-1444. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356105.1779. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
High-Power Laser Therapy Improves Healing of the Equine Suspensory Branch in a Standardized Lesion Model.高功率激光疗法可改善标准损伤模型中马悬韧带分支的愈合情况。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 3;7:600. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00600. eCollection 2020.
8
The Beneficial Effects of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Co-Interventions on Musculoskeletal Pain Management: A Systematic Review.高强度激光疗法及联合干预措施对肌肉骨骼疼痛管理的有益效果:一项系统评价
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Winter;11(1):81-90. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2020.14. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
9
The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.桑德斯牵引装置联合高强度激光疗法治疗颈椎病的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jan 20;23:335-342. doi: 10.12659/msm.899454.
10
Ultrasonography for the assessment of the upper trapezius properties in healthy females: a reliability study.超声检查评估健康女性斜方肌上束特性:一项可靠性研究
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016 May 19;6(1):167-72. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.1.167. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Low level laser therapy as an adjunctive technique in the management of temporomandibular disorders.低强度激光疗法作为颞下颌关节紊乱病管理中的辅助技术。
Cranio. 2012 Oct;30(4):264-71. doi: 10.1179/crn.2012.040.
2
Considerations in the physical rehabilitation of patients with whiplash-associated disorders.考虑在与挥鞭样损伤相关的疾病患者的身体康复中。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S286-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318238823c.
3
Neuronal hyperexcitability in the dorsal horn after painful facet joint injury.疼痛性小关节损伤后背角神经元兴奋性增加。
Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.034. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
4
Low-level laser therapy for acute neck pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study.低水平激光治疗神经根型颈椎病急性疼痛的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Pain Med. 2010 Aug;11(8):1169-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00907.x.
5
Whiplash injury: 30-year follow-up of a single series.挥鞭样损伤:单一队列的30年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jun;92(6):853-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23404.
6
The course of symptoms for whiplash-associated disorders in Sweden: 6-month followup study.瑞典挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的症状进程:6 个月随访研究。
J Rheumatol. 2010 Jul;37(7):1527-33. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.091321. Epub 2010 May 15.
7
Acute low back pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.急性下腰痛伴神经根病:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Aug;28(4):553-60. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2576.
8
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials.低强度激光疗法治疗颈部疼痛的疗效:一项对随机安慰剂对照或积极治疗对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet. 2009 Dec 5;374(9705):1897-908. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61522-1. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
9
Biomechanics of whiplash injury.挥鞭伤的生物力学
Chin J Traumatol. 2009 Oct;12(5):305-14.
10
Effect of global posture reeducation and of static stretching on pain, range of motion, and quality of life in women with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.整体姿势再教育和静态拉伸对慢性颈痛女性疼痛、活动范围及生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Dec;63(6):763-70. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000600010.