Istituto di Neurologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy; Neurologia I, Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):874-83. doi: 10.1002/mds.25579.
Many rating scales have been applied to the evaluation of dystonia, but only few have been assessed for clinimetric properties. The Movement Disorders Society commissioned this task force to critique existing dystonia rating scales and place them in the clinical and clinimetric context. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify rating scales that have either been validated or used in dystonia. Thirty-six potential scales were identified. Eight were excluded because they did not meet review criteria, leaving 28 scales that were critiqued and rated by the task force. Seven scales were found to meet criteria to be "recommended": the Blepharospasm Disability Index is recommended for rating blepharospasm; the Cervical Dystonia Impact Scale and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale for rating cervical dystonia; the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire for blepharospasm and cervical dystonia; the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Vocal Performance Questionnaire (VPQ) for laryngeal dystonia; and the Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale for rating generalized dystonia. Two "recommended" scales (VHI and VPQ) are generic scales validated on few patients with laryngeal dystonia, whereas the others are disease-specific scales. Twelve scales met criteria for "suggested" and 7 scales met criteria for "listed." All the scales are individually reviewed in the online information. The task force recommends 5 specific dystonia scales and suggests to further validate 2 recommended generic voice-disorder scales in dystonia. Existing scales for oromandibular, arm, and task-specific dystonia should be refined and fully assessed. Scales should be developed for body regions for which no scales are available, such as lower limbs and trunk.
许多评定量表已被应用于评估肌张力障碍,但仅有少数经过了临床和计量属性评估。运动障碍协会委托该工作组对现有的肌张力障碍评定量表进行评估,并将其置于临床和计量学背景下。我们进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定已经经过验证或用于肌张力障碍的评定量表。确定了 36 个潜在的量表。其中 8 个因不符合审查标准而被排除,剩下 28 个量表由工作组进行了评价和评分。发现有 7 个量表符合“推荐”标准:眼睑痉挛残疾指数(Blepharospasm Disability Index)被推荐用于眼睑痉挛的评定;颈肌张力障碍影响量表(Cervical Dystonia Impact Scale)和多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale)用于颈肌张力障碍的评定;颅颈肌张力障碍问卷(Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire)用于眼睑痉挛和颈肌张力障碍的评定;嗓音障碍指数(Voice Handicap Index,VHI)和嗓音表现问卷(Vocal Performance Questionnaire,VPQ)用于喉肌张力障碍的评定;Fahn-Marsden 肌张力障碍评定量表(Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale)用于全身肌张力障碍的评定。2 个“推荐”量表(VHI 和 VPQ)是在少数喉肌张力障碍患者中验证的通用量表,而其他量表则是针对特定疾病的量表。12 个量表符合“建议”标准,7 个量表符合“列入”标准。所有量表均在在线信息中进行了单独审查。工作组建议使用 5 种特定的肌张力障碍量表,并建议进一步验证 2 种推荐的通用嗓音障碍量表在肌张力障碍中的应用。应完善和全面评估口颌面部、手臂和特定任务的肌张力障碍现有量表。应开发用于尚无量表的身体部位,如下肢和躯干的量表。