University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", Zurich, Switzerland.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):796-808. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0805-9.
Refreshing and elaboration are cognitive processes assumed to underlie verbal working-memory maintenance and assumed to support long-term memory formation. Whereas refreshing refers to the attentional focussing on representations, elaboration refers to linking representations in working memory into existing semantic networks. We measured the impact of instructed refreshing and elaboration on working and long-term memory separately, and investigated to what extent both processes are distinct in their contributions to working as well as long-term memory. Compared with a no-processing baseline, immediate memory was improved by repeating the items, but not by refreshing them. There was no credible effect of elaboration on working memory, except when items were repeated at the same time. Long-term memory benefited from elaboration, but not from refreshing the words. The results replicate the long-term memory benefit for elaboration, but do not support its beneficial role for working memory. Further, refreshing preserves immediate memory, but does not improve it beyond the level achieved without any processing.
刷新和阐述被认为是认知过程,它们是言语工作记忆维持的基础,并且被认为支持长期记忆的形成。刷新是指注意力集中在表示上,而阐述是指将工作记忆中的表示与现有的语义网络联系起来。我们分别测量了指令刷新和阐述对工作记忆和长期记忆的影响,并研究了这两个过程在对工作记忆和长期记忆的贡献方面有多大的区别。与无处理基线相比,重复项目可以提高即时记忆,但刷新项目则不能。阐述对工作记忆没有可信的影响,除非同时重复项目。长期记忆受益于阐述,但不受刷新单词的影响。结果复制了阐述对长期记忆的益处,但不支持其对工作记忆的有益作用。此外,刷新可以保留即时记忆,但不能在没有任何处理的情况下提高即时记忆的水平。