Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2116-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a4337.
Preclinical studies reveal the neuroprotective properties of xenon, especially when combined with hypothermia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and cardiac safety of inhaled xenon treatment combined with therapeutic hypothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
An open controlled and randomized single-centre clinical drug trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00879892).
A multipurpose ICU in university hospital.
Thirty-six adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (18-80 years old) with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia as initial cardiac rhythm.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either mild therapeutic hypothermia treatment with target temperature of 33°C (mild therapeutic hypothermia group, n=18) alone or in combination with xenon by inhalation, to achieve a target concentration of at least 40% (Xenon+mild therapeutic hypothermia group, n=18) for 24 hours. Thirty-three patients were evaluable (mild therapeutic hypothermia group, n=17; Xenon+mild therapeutic hypothermia group, n=16).
Patients were treated and monitored according to the Utstein protocol. The release of troponin-T was determined at arrival to hospital and at 24, 48, and 72 hours after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The median end-tidal xenon concentration was 47% and duration of the xenon inhalation was 25.5 hours. The frequency of serious adverse events, including inhospital mortality, status epilepticus, and acute kidney injury, was similar in both groups and there were no unexpected serious adverse reactions to xenon during hospital stay. In addition, xenon did not induce significant conduction, repolarization, or rhythm abnormalities. Median dose of norepinephrine during hypothermia was lower in xenon-treated patients (mild therapeutic hypothermia group=5.30 mg vs Xenon+mild therapeutic hypothermia group=2.95 mg, p=0.06). Heart rate was significantly lower in Xenon+mild therapeutic hypothermia patients during hypothermia (p=0.04). Postarrival incremental change in troponin-T at 72 hours was significantly less in the Xenon+mild therapeutic hypothermia group (p=0.04).
Xenon treatment in combination with hypothermia is feasible and has favorable cardiac features in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
临床前研究表明,氙气具有神经保护作用,尤其是与低温联合使用时。本研究旨在探讨在院外心脏骤停患者中使用吸入氙气联合治疗性低温的可行性和心脏安全性。
一项开放对照、随机、单中心临床药物试验(clinicaltrials.gov NCT00879892)。
大学医院的多用途 ICU。
36 例成年院外心脏骤停患者(18-80 岁),初始心搏节律为心室颤动或无脉性室性心动过速。
患者随机分为接受单纯亚低温治疗(目标温度 33°C)的亚低温治疗组(n=18)或联合氙气吸入治疗,以达到至少 40%的目标浓度(氙气+亚低温治疗组,n=18),持续 24 小时。33 例患者可评估(亚低温治疗组,n=17;氙气+亚低温治疗组,n=16)。
患者根据乌斯太恩方案进行治疗和监测。肌钙蛋白-T 的释放在入院时和院外心脏骤停后 24、48 和 72 小时进行测定。呼气末氙气浓度中位数为 47%,氙气吸入时间为 25.5 小时。两组严重不良事件(包括院内死亡率、癫痫持续状态和急性肾损伤)的发生率相似,住院期间未发生氙气的意外严重不良反应。此外,氙气并未引起明显的传导、复极或节律异常。低温期间去甲肾上腺素的中位剂量在氙气治疗患者中较低(亚低温治疗组=5.30mg 对氙气+亚低温治疗组=2.95mg,p=0.06)。低温期间,氙气+亚低温治疗组患者的心率明显较低(p=0.04)。72 小时时肌钙蛋白-T 的到达后增量变化在氙气+亚低温治疗组显著减少(p=0.04)。
在院外心脏骤停幸存者中,氙气联合低温治疗是可行的,具有良好的心脏特征。