Suppr超能文献

野生动物研究人员在许可证迷宫中摸索前行。

Wildlife researchers running the permit maze.

作者信息

Paul Ellen, Sikes Robert S

出版信息

ILAR J. 2013;54(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt013.

Abstract

The study of wildlife, whether in the field or in the lab, may start with a hypothesis, a literature search, or a grant proposal, but in many cases, the work will never happen unless the researcher successfully navigates a maze of permit requirements. A single project can involve multiple permits at the national and state levels, and it can take months to obtain any one permit. Therefore, permits may not have been issued at the time of protocol review, but Public Health Service Policy makes accommodations for this situation. Once in hand, however, the permits convey critical information to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC): one or more government agencies have determined that the activity will not be detrimental to the population or that any detriment is justified by the scientific knowledge that will be generated. This paper assumes that IACUCs are reviewing all wildlife protocols involving live vertebrates, regardless of the current, albeit temporary, distinction made by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care with regard to birds.

摘要

对野生动物的研究,无论是在野外还是在实验室,可能始于一个假设、一次文献检索或一份资助申请,但在许多情况下,除非研究人员成功地应对一系列繁琐的许可要求,否则这项工作将无法开展。一个单一的项目可能涉及国家和州层面的多项许可,而且获得任何一项许可都可能需要数月时间。因此,在方案审查时可能尚未颁发许可,但公共卫生服务政策对此种情况有所考虑。然而,一旦获得许可,它们会向机构动物护理与使用委员会(IACUC)传达关键信息:一个或多个政府机构已确定该活动不会对种群造成不利影响,或者任何不利影响都因即将产生的科学知识而合理。本文假定IACUC正在审查所有涉及活体脊椎动物的野生动物方案,无论动植物卫生检验局动物护理目前(尽管是暂时的)对鸟类所作的区分如何。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Publication reform to safeguard wildlife from researcher harm.促进出版改革以保护野生动物免受研究人员伤害。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Apr 11;17(4):e3000193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000193. eCollection 2019 Apr.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验