Suppr超能文献

临床计量学专栏:深入探讨最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

作者信息

Wright Alexis, Hannon Joseph, Hegedus Eric J, Kavchak Alicia Emerson

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Aug;20(3):160-6. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000001.

Abstract

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores are commonly used by clinicians when determining patient response to treatment and to guide clinical decision-making during the course of treatment. For research purposes, the MCID score is often used in sample size calculations for adequate powering of a study to minimize the false-positives (type 1 errors) and the false-negatives (type 2 errors). For clinicians and researchers alike, it is critical that the MCID score is a valid and stable measure. A low MCID value may result in overestimating the positive effects of treatment, whereas a high MCID value may incorrectly classify patients as failing to respond to treatment when in fact the treatment was beneficial. The wide range of methodologies for calculating the MCID score results in varied outcomes, which leads to difficulties with interpretation and application. This clinimetrics corner outlines key factors influencing MCID estimates and discusses limitations with the use of the MCID in both clinical and research practice settings.

摘要

最小临床重要差异(MCID)分数在临床医生确定患者对治疗的反应以及在治疗过程中指导临床决策时经常被使用。出于研究目的,MCID分数常用于样本量计算,以使研究具有足够的效力,从而将假阳性(I型错误)和假阴性(II型错误)降至最低。对于临床医生和研究人员而言,MCID分数是一种有效且稳定的测量方法至关重要。较低的MCID值可能导致高估治疗的积极效果,而较高的MCID值可能会在实际上治疗有益时将患者错误地归类为对治疗无反应。计算MCID分数的方法多种多样,导致结果各异,这给解释和应用带来了困难。本临床计量学专栏概述了影响MCID估计的关键因素,并讨论了在临床和研究实践环境中使用MCID的局限性。

相似文献

8

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement.最小临床重要改善的基线依赖。
Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):675-88. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100229. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
3
Outcome measures in chronic low back pain.慢性下背痛的疗效评估。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1484-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1353-6. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
5
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods.注意 MIC:人群和方法之间存在较大差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):524-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验