School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
We investigated whether ethnic and country of birth differences in adult Body Mass Index (BMI) were associated with differences in diet, physical activity and ethnic density (the percentage of an ethnic group within the neighbourhood environment). A sample of 214,807 adults living in Australia was extracted from the 45 and Up Study. Analyses comprised multilevel modelling of BMI for 38 ethnic and country of birth groups. Physical activity was ascertained using the Active Australia Survey. Dietary measures included self-reported consumption of fruit, vegetables, meat and cheese. Ethnic density was objectively measured using 2006 Australian Census data. Possible confounders included age, gender, household income, educational qualifications, economic status, couple status, language, duration of residence, neighbourhood affluence and remoteness. Compared to Australian-born Australians (age-gender adjusted mean BMI = 27.1, 95%CI 27.1, 27.2), overseas-born groups often had lower mean BMI, especially the Chinese born in China (23.2, 23.0, 23.4). Exceptions included the Italians (BMI = 28.1), Greeks (28.5), Maltese (27.6), Lebanese (28.4) and Croatians (27.8) born in their ethnic-country of origin. Regardless of birthplace, BMI was lower for the English, Scottish, and Chinese, but higher for Italians and Greeks. Some ethnic differences reflected the 'healthy migrant' hypothesis, whereas others did not. These differences were only partially attenuated by controls for portions of fruit and vegetables, meat and cheese, frequency of participation in physical activity, and other explanatory variables. Ethnic density was associated with lower BMI for the English and Irish (p < 0.05), regardless of whether they were born in the UK, Ireland, or Australia. Ethnic differences in adult weight status in Australia do not appear to be fully explained by conventional risk factors. For some groups, but not all, living among others of the same ethnic group may proxy unmeasured health-promoting factors and these contexts, along with other factors that harm health (e.g. racial discrimination) warrant further investigation.
我们研究了成年人身体质量指数(BMI)的民族和出生地差异是否与饮食、身体活动和民族密度(民族群体在社区环境中的百分比)的差异有关。从澳大利亚的 45 岁及以上研究中提取了 214807 名成年人的样本。对 38 个民族和出生地群体的 BMI 进行了多层次建模分析。身体活动通过澳大利亚积极调查进行了测定。饮食措施包括自我报告的水果、蔬菜、肉和奶酪的消费。民族密度使用 2006 年澳大利亚人口普查数据进行了客观测量。可能的混杂因素包括年龄、性别、家庭收入、教育程度、经济地位、夫妻状况、语言、居住时间、邻里富裕程度和偏远程度。与澳大利亚出生的澳大利亚人相比(年龄性别调整后的平均 BMI=27.1,95%CI 27.1,27.2),海外出生的人群通常 BMI 较低,尤其是在中国出生的中国人(23.2,23.0,23.4)。例外的是意大利人(BMI=28.1)、希腊人(28.5)、马耳他人(27.6)、黎巴嫩人(28.4)和克罗地亚人(27.8)。无论出生地如何,英国人、苏格兰人和中国人的 BMI 较低,而意大利人和希腊人的 BMI 较高。一些民族差异反映了“健康移民”假说,而另一些则没有。通过控制水果和蔬菜、肉和奶酪的摄入量、身体活动的参与频率以及其他解释变量,这些差异仅部分减弱。无论他们是在英国、爱尔兰还是澳大利亚出生,民族密度与英国人、爱尔兰人较低的 BMI 相关(p<0.05)。澳大利亚成年人体重状况的民族差异似乎不能完全用传统的风险因素来解释。对于一些群体,但不是所有群体,与同一民族的其他人生活在一起可能代表了未测量的促进健康的因素,这些环境以及其他危害健康的因素(例如种族歧视)值得进一步研究。