• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Verbal worry facilitates attention to threat in high-worriers.言语担忧促进高担忧者对威胁的注意。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
2
Worry in imagery and verbal form: effect on residual working memory capacity.表象和言语形式的担忧:对剩余工作记忆容量的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Feb;49(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
3
Engaging in imagery versus verbal processing of worry: Impact on negative intrusions in high worriers.参与想象与言语处理担忧:对高担忧者负面侵入的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 May;48(5):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
4
The extent and nature of imagery during worry and positive thinking in generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍中担忧和积极思考时的意象的程度和性质。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):238-43. doi: 10.1037/a0024947. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
5
Concreteness of idiographic worry and anticipatory processing.特质性担忧与预期加工的具体性。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;54:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
6
The effect of verbal and imagery-based worry versus distraction on the emotional response to a stressful in-vivo situation.基于言语和意象的担忧与分心对压力情境下体内情绪反应的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;52:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
The effect of uncertainty on attentional bias in subclinical worriers: Evidence from reaction time and eye-tracking.不确定性对亚临床担忧者注意偏向的影响:来自反应时和眼动追踪的证据。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;81:101842. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101842. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Does a novel training in mental imagery reduce pathological worry?新的心理意象训练能否减少病理性担忧?
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Oct;109:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
9
Generalized Anxiety Disorder, worry and attention to threat: A systematic review.广泛性焦虑障碍、担忧和对威胁的关注:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;54:107-122. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Effects of a training in mental imagery on worry: A proof-of-principle study.心理意象训练对担忧的影响:一项原理验证研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Jan;45:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Content specificity of attentional bias to COVID-19 threat-related information in trait anxiety.特质焦虑中对新冠病毒疾病威胁相关信息的注意偏向的内容特异性
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 16;14:1254349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1254349. eCollection 2023.
2
The relationship between worry and attentional bias to threat cues signalling controllable and uncontrollable dangers.担忧与对可控和不可控危险信号的威胁线索的注意偏向之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251350. eCollection 2021.
3
Within-person increase in pathological worry predicts future depletion of unique executive functioning domains.个体内病理性担忧的增加预示着未来独特执行功能领域的消耗。
Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;51(10):1676-1686. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000422. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Approaching Cognitive Behavior Therapy For Generalized Anxiety Disorder From A Cognitive Process Perspective.从认知过程视角探讨广泛性焦虑症的认知行为疗法
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 4;10:796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00796. eCollection 2019.
5
Innovations in digital interventions for psychological trauma: harnessing advances in cognitive science.心理创伤数字干预的创新:利用认知科学的进展
Mhealth. 2018 Oct 19;4:47. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.09.11. eCollection 2018.
6
Worry amplifies theory-of-mind reasoning for negatively valenced social stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder.担忧会放大广泛性焦虑障碍患者对负性社会刺激的心理理论推理。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.084. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Automaticity of Attentional Bias to Threat in High and Low Worriers.高焦虑者和低焦虑者对威胁的注意偏向自动化
Cognit Ther Res. 2017;41(3):479-488. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9818-5. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
8
Heterogeneity in Autonomic Arousal Level in Perseverative Worry: The Role of Cognitive Control and Verbal Thought.强迫性担忧中自主唤醒水平的异质性:认知控制和言语思维的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 13;11:108. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00108. eCollection 2017.
9
Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition.针对伴有和不伴有既往反复消极思维的解释进行认知偏差修正,以减少广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症中的担忧和沉思:一项带有积极对照条件的多阶段实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 16;6(12):e013404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404.
10
Delineating the Role of Negative Verbal Thinking in Promoting Worry, Perceived Threat, and Anxiety.阐明消极言语思维在引发担忧、感知威胁和焦虑方面的作用。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;3(4):637-647. doi: 10.1177/2167702615577349. Epub 2015 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
A cognitive model of pathological worry.病理性担忧的认知模型。
Behav Res Ther. 2012 Oct;50(10):636-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
2
Worry in imagery and verbal form: effect on residual working memory capacity.表象和言语形式的担忧:对剩余工作记忆容量的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Feb;49(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
3
The impact of worry on attention to threat.担忧对注意威胁的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 14;5(10):e13411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013411.
4
Engaging in imagery versus verbal processing of worry: Impact on negative intrusions in high worriers.参与想象与言语处理担忧:对高担忧者负面侵入的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 May;48(5):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
5
Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders.情绪和情绪障碍中的心理意象。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;30(3):349-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
6
The effect of attention modification with explicit vs. minimal instructions on worry.注意修正对担忧的影响:明确指导与最小指导的比较。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Mar;48(3):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
7
Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias.选择性注意与情绪易感性:通过对注意偏向的实验操纵来评估它们关联的因果基础。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Feb;111(1):107-23.
8
A comparison of three worry questionnaires.三种焦虑问卷的比较。
Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jan;31(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90042-s.
9
Test-retest reliabilities of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in a stressful social analogue situation.状态-特质焦虑量表在应激性社会模拟情境中的重测信度。
J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):276-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_8.
10
Attentional bias in emotional disorders.情绪障碍中的注意偏向。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Feb;95(1):15-20. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15.

言语担忧促进高担忧者对威胁的注意。

Verbal worry facilitates attention to threat in high-worriers.

机构信息

King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, UK.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.05.006
PMID:23906509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3857595/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Worry is predominantly a verbal-linguistic process with relatively little imagery. This study investigated whether the verbal nature of worry contributes to the maintenance of worry by enhancing attention to threat. It was hypothesised that verbal worry would lead to greater attentional bias to threat than imagery-based worry.

METHODS

Fifty high-worriers were randomly assigned to one of two groups, one in which they were instructed to worry in a verbal way and one in which they worried in an imagery-based way, before completing a dot probe task as a measure of attention to threat-related words.

RESULTS

Those who worried in verbal form demonstrated greater attentional bias to threat than did those who worried in imagery-based form. These findings could not be accounted for by group differences in personal relevance of or distress associated with worry topics, state mood following worry, levels of the relatedness of participants' worries to stimuli on the dot probe task, trait anxiety, general propensity to worry, nor adherence to the worry training.

LIMITATIONS

The present study only included word stimuli in the dot probe task; inclusion of images would allow for firmly rejecting the hypothesis that the attention effects observed following verbal worry were merely a result of priming verbal threat representations. Also, future studies could include a further control group that does not engage in any form of worry to ascertain that verbal worry increased attentional bias rather than imagery decreasing pre-existing attentional bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Possible mechanisms underlying this effect of verbal worry on attention to threat are discussed, together with clinical implications of the current findings.

摘要

背景与目的

担忧主要是一种言语语言过程,相对较少涉及意象。本研究旨在探究担忧的言语性质是否通过增强对威胁的注意力而有助于维持担忧。研究假设,与基于意象的担忧相比,言语担忧会导致对威胁的注意力偏向更大。

方法

将 50 名高担忧者随机分配到两个组中的一个,一个组被指示以言语方式担忧,另一个组以基于意象的方式担忧,然后完成点探测任务,以衡量对与威胁相关的词语的注意力。

结果

以言语形式担忧的人比以基于意象的形式担忧的人表现出更大的对威胁的注意力偏向。这些发现不能用以下方面的组间差异来解释:担忧主题的个人相关性或与担忧相关的痛苦、担忧后的状态情绪、参与者的担忧与点探测任务上的刺激之间的相关性水平、特质焦虑、一般担忧倾向,也不能用对担忧训练的遵守来解释。

局限性

本研究仅在点探测任务中包含单词刺激;如果包含图像,则可以坚决拒绝以下假设,即言语担忧后观察到的注意力效应仅仅是对言语威胁表示的启动的结果。此外,未来的研究可以包括一个进一步的对照组,即不进行任何形式的担忧,以确定言语担忧是否增加了对威胁的注意力偏向,而不是意象降低了预先存在的注意力偏向。

结论

讨论了言语担忧对威胁注意力的这种影响的可能机制,并讨论了当前发现的临床意义。