DTU Food, National Food Institute, Lyngby, Denmark.
Food Nutr Res. 2013 Jul 30;57. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v57i0.21245. Print 2013.
The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the evidence behind the dietary requirement of protein and to assess the health effects of varying protein intake in healthy adults. The literature search covered the years 2000-2011. Prospective cohort, case-control, and intervention studies were included. Out of a total of 5,718 abstracts, 412 full papers were identified as potentially relevant, and after careful scrutiny, 64 papers were quality graded as A (highest), B, or C. The grade of evidence was classified as convincing, probable, suggestive or inconclusive. The evidence is assessed as: probable for an estimated average requirement of 0.66 g good-quality protein/kg body weight (BW)/day based on nitrogen balance studies, suggestive for a relationship between increased all-cause mortality risk and long-term low-carbohydrate-high-protein (LCHP) diets; but inconclusive for a relationship between all-cause mortality risk and protein intake per se; suggestive for an inverse relationship between cardiovascular mortality and vegetable protein intake; inconclusive for relationships between cancer mortality and cancer diseases, respectively, and protein intake; inconclusive for a relationship between cardiovascular diseases and total protein intake; suggestive for an inverse relationship between blood pressure (BP) and vegetable protein; probable to convincing for an inverse relationship between soya protein intake and LDL cholesterol; inconclusive for a relationship between protein intake and bone health, energy intake, BW control, body composition, renal function, and risk of kidney stones, respectively; suggestive for a relationship between increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and long-term LCHP-high-fat diets; inconclusive for impact of physical training on protein requirement; and suggestive for effect of physical training on whole-body protein retention. In conclusion, the evidence is assessed as probable regarding the estimated requirement based on nitrogen balance studies, and suggestive to inconclusive for protein intake and mortality and morbidity. Vegetable protein intake was associated with decreased risk in many studies. Potentially adverse effects of a protein intake exceeding 20-23 E% remain to be investigated.
本系统评价的目的是评估蛋白质的饮食需求背后的证据,并评估健康成年人中不同蛋白质摄入量的健康影响。文献检索涵盖了 2000 年至 2011 年。纳入了前瞻性队列研究、病例对照研究和干预研究。在总共 5718 篇摘要中,有 412 篇全文被认为与研究相关,经过仔细审查,有 64 篇论文被评为 A(最高)、B 或 C 级。证据等级被分为有说服力、很可能、提示性或无结论性。证据评估如下:基于氮平衡研究,估计蛋白质的平均需求量为 0.66g 优质蛋白质/kg 体重(BW)/天,证据为很可能;长期低碳水化合物高蛋白(LCHP)饮食与全因死亡率增加之间存在关系的证据为提示性;但蛋白质摄入量与全因死亡率之间的关系无结论性;心血管死亡率与植物性蛋白质摄入量之间呈负相关,证据为提示性;癌症死亡率与癌症疾病之间的关系,分别与蛋白质摄入量,证据为无结论性;癌症死亡率与癌症疾病之间的关系,分别与蛋白质摄入量,证据为无结论性;心血管疾病与总蛋白摄入量之间的关系,证据为无结论性;血压(BP)与植物性蛋白质之间呈负相关,证据为很可能到有说服力;大豆蛋白摄入量与 LDL 胆固醇之间呈负相关,证据为很可能;蛋白质摄入量与骨骼健康、能量摄入、BW 控制、身体成分、肾功能和肾结石风险之间的关系,证据为无结论性;长期 LCHP-高脂肪饮食与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)风险增加之间存在关系,证据为提示性;蛋白质需求对体力训练的影响无结论性;体力训练对全身蛋白质保留的影响,证据为提示性。总之,基于氮平衡研究,证据评估为估计需求为很可能,而蛋白质摄入量与死亡率和发病率的关系为提示性到无结论性。在许多研究中,植物性蛋白质摄入量与降低风险有关。蛋白质摄入量超过 20-23E%的潜在不良影响仍有待研究。