Parsapoor A, Mohammad K, Malek Afzali H, Ala'eddini F, Larijani B
Medical Ethics PhD student, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, and School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2012 Mar 1;5:2. Print 2012.
Studying the situation of observance of patients' rights and interaction of those individuals who provide and/or receive health services are regarded as the most significant and salient parameters of qualitative evaluation of health services. The main aim of this study is to compare the attitudes of patients as recipients of healthcare services with those of physicians and nurses as representatives of healthcare providers regarding the necessity of observance of various aspects of patients' rights in three hospitals selected as representing the three models of providing medical service (teaching, private and public). This was a cross-sectional descriptive analytical study and the data were gathered using a questionnaire. Researchers helped the patients to fill in the questionnaire through interviewing and the physicians and nurses filled in their own questionnaires. The field consisted of three hospitals (a teaching general hospital, a private hospital and a public general one) all located in Tehran. The questionnaires included a set of general questions regarding demographic information and 21 questions about the necessity of observance of patients' rights. They were filled in by the interviewer for 143 patients and, after being sent to other groups, 143 nurses (response rate = 61.3%) and 82 physicians (response rate = 27.5%) filled them in. The criterion for necessity of each right was measured according to the Likert Scale [from 0 (not necessary) to 10 (absolutely necessary]. The data were analyzed using SPSS 11.5 software. Given the abnormal distribution of the data, non-parametrical tests were used. The results of this study showed that all of the study groups agreed with the necessity of almost all aspects of patients' rights and the highest level of disagreement between groups was related to patients' right of access to information and right of choosing provision provider and deciding on treatment plan. However, these disagreements were not significant altogether. According to the results, it seems that healthcare providers, especially physicians, should be better familiarized with patients' right of access to information and right of choosing and deciding. Based on the disagreement between the attitudes of the patients and physicians in this study, it seems that the patients had a higher level of expectations concerning their rights compared to physicians.
研究患者权利的遵守情况以及提供和/或接受医疗服务的人员之间的互动,被视为医疗服务质量评估中最重要和最显著的参数。本研究的主要目的是比较作为医疗服务接受者的患者与作为医疗服务提供者代表的医生和护士,对选定的代表三种医疗服务模式(教学、私立和公立)的三家医院中患者权利各方面遵守必要性的态度。这是一项横断面描述性分析研究,数据通过问卷收集。研究人员通过访谈帮助患者填写问卷,医生和护士自行填写问卷。研究对象包括位于德黑兰的三家医院(一家教学综合医院、一家私立医院和一家公立综合医院)。问卷包括一组关于人口统计学信息的一般问题以及21个关于患者权利遵守必要性的问题。由访谈者为143名患者填写问卷,问卷发放给其他群体后,143名护士(回复率 = 61.3%)和82名医生(回复率 = 27.5%)填写了问卷。每项权利必要性的标准根据李克特量表衡量[从0(不必要)到10(绝对必要)]。数据使用SPSS 11.5软件进行分析。鉴于数据分布异常,采用非参数检验。本研究结果表明,所有研究组都认同患者权利几乎所有方面的必要性,各群体之间分歧最大的是患者获取信息的权利、选择服务提供者和决定治疗方案的权利。然而,这些分歧总体上并不显著。根据研究结果,似乎医疗服务提供者,尤其是医生,应该更好地熟悉患者获取信息的权利以及选择和决定权。基于本研究中患者和医生态度的分歧,似乎患者对其权利的期望水平高于医生。