Theeuwes Jan, Van der Burg Erik
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Vis. 2013 Aug 2;13(3):21. doi: 10.1167/13.3.21.
The present study used visual prior entry to determine which of two stimuli received attention first. Observers were asked to judge whether two test stimuli across a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) were synchronized or not (simultaneity judgment task; SJ), or to report the temporal order of the two test stimuli (temporal order judgment task; TOJ). Before the presentation of the two test stimuli, a single noninformative stimulus that matched the color of one of the test stimuli was presented in the center of the display. The results showed that, in both the TOJ and SJ tasks, the noninformative stimulus caused a shift in the psychometric function such that the test stimulus that had the same color as the preceding noninformative stimulus was seen earlier in time than the test stimulus that had a color that did not match. In other words, the mere processing of the color of a noninformative stimulus, rendered the stimulus having that same color more salient, an effect that we attributed to priming. Because priming made one of the stimuli more salient, it received attention first and accelerated its processing, causing prior entry into awareness. Importantly, when the noninformative stimulus was a color word, no such priming effect was observed. We conclude that a primed test stimulus has the ability to capture attention in an automatic way.
本研究采用视觉先入效应来确定两个刺激中哪个先被注意到。要求观察者判断在一系列刺激起始异步(SOA)下的两个测试刺激是否同步(同时性判断任务;SJ),或者报告两个测试刺激的时间顺序(时间顺序判断任务;TOJ)。在呈现两个测试刺激之前,在显示屏中央呈现一个与其中一个测试刺激颜色匹配的单一非信息性刺激。结果表明,在TOJ和SJ任务中,非信息性刺激导致心理测量函数发生偏移,使得与先前非信息性刺激颜色相同的测试刺激比颜色不匹配的测试刺激在时间上更早被看到。换句话说,仅仅对非信息性刺激的颜色进行处理,就使得具有相同颜色的刺激更加突出,我们将这种效应归因于启动。因为启动使其中一个刺激更加突出,它首先受到关注并加速其处理,从而导致先进入意识。重要的是,当非信息性刺激是一个颜色词时,没有观察到这种启动效应。我们得出结论,一个被启动的测试刺激有能力以自动的方式吸引注意力。