Suppr超能文献

低效视觉搜索中的启动效应:真实存在但短暂。

Priming effects in inefficient visual search: Real, but transient.

机构信息

Visual Attention Lab, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1417-1431. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02503-5. Epub 2022 May 16.

Abstract

In visual search tasks, responses to targets on one trial can influence responses on the next trial. Most typically, target repetition speeds response while switching to a different target slows response. Such "priming" effects have sometimes been given very significant roles in theories of search (e.g., Theeuwes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 1628, 2013). Most work on priming has involved "singleton" or "popout" tasks. In non-popout priming tasks, observers must often perform a task-switching operation because the guiding template for one target (e.g., a red vertical target in a conjunction task) is incompatible with efficient search for the other target (green horizontal, in this example). We examined priming in inefficient search where the priming feature (Color: Experiments 1-3, Shape: Experiments 4-5) was irrelevant to the task of finding a T among Ls. We wished to determine if finding a red T on one trial helped observers to be more efficient if the next T was also red. In all experiments, we found additive priming effects. The reaction time (RT) for the second trial was shorter if the color of the T was repeated. However, there was no interaction with set size. The slope of the RT × Set Size function was not shallower for runs of the same target color, compared to trials where the target color switched. We propose that priming might produce transient guidance of the earliest deployments of attention on the next trial or it might speed decisions about a selected target. Priming does not appear to guide attention over the entire search.

摘要

在视觉搜索任务中,对一个试次中目标的反应会影响下一个试次的反应。最常见的情况是,目标重复会加速反应,而切换到不同目标会减缓反应。这种“启动”效应在搜索理论中有时被赋予非常重要的角色(例如,Theeuwes,《英国皇家学会哲学汇刊 B:生物科学》,368,1628,2013)。大多数关于启动的研究都涉及“单一”或“突显”任务。在非突显启动任务中,观察者通常必须执行任务切换操作,因为一个目标的引导模板(例如,在合取任务中红色垂直目标)与另一个目标(在本例中为绿色水平目标)的有效搜索不兼容。我们研究了低效搜索中的启动,其中启动特征(颜色:实验 1-3,形状:实验 4-5)与在 Ls 中找到 T 的任务无关。我们想确定在一个试次中找到红色 T 是否有助于观察者在下一个 T 也是红色时更有效率。在所有实验中,我们都发现了加性启动效应。如果 T 的颜色重复,则第二个试次的反应时间(RT)更短。然而,与目标颜色切换的试次相比,这与集大小之间没有交互作用。与目标颜色切换的试次相比,相同目标颜色的连续运行的 RT×集大小函数斜率没有更浅。我们提出,启动可能会产生对下一个试次中注意力最早部署的短暂引导,或者它可能会加快对选定目标的决策。启动似乎并没有引导整个搜索的注意力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9712/9109951/6de63ddb976d/13414_2022_2503_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验