Lee Tiane L, Fiske Susan T, Glick Peter, Chen Zhixia
Princeton University.
Sex Roles. 2010 Apr 1;62(7-8):583-601. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x.
Gender-based structural power and heterosexual dependency produce ambivalent gender ideologies, with hostility and benevolence separately shaping close-relationship ideals. The relative importance of romanticized benevolent versus more overtly power-based hostile sexism, however, may be culturally dependent. Testing this, northeast US (=311) and central Chinese (=290) undergraduates rated prescriptions and proscriptions (ideals) for partners and completed Ambivalent Sexism and Ambivalence toward Men Inventories (ideologies). Multiple regressions analyses conducted on group-specific relationship ideals revealed that benevolent ideologies predicted partner ideals, in both countries, especially for US culture's romance-oriented relationships. Hostile attitudes predicted men's ideals, both American and Chinese, suggesting both societies' dominant-partner advantage.
基于性别的结构权力和异性恋依赖产生了矛盾的性别意识形态，敌意和善意分别塑造了亲密关系的理想模式。然而，浪漫化的善意性别歧视与更明显基于权力的敌意性别歧视的相对重要性可能取决于文化。为了验证这一点，美国东北部（n = 311）和中国中部（n = 290）的本科生对伴侣的规定和禁令（理想模式）进行了评分，并完成了矛盾性别歧视和对男性矛盾态度量表（意识形态）。对特定群体的关系理想进行的多元回归分析表明，在这两个国家，善意意识形态都预示着伴侣理想，特别是对于美国文化中以浪漫为导向的关系。敌意态度预示着美国和中国男性的理想，这表明两个社会中占主导地位的伴侣优势。
