Suppr超能文献

发热布基纳法索旅行者中疟疾的相关性和诊断:一项前瞻性研究。

Malaria relevance and diagnosis in febrile Burkina Faso travellers: a prospective study.

机构信息

Institut de Parasitologie et de Pathologie Tropicale, EA 4438, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Malar J. 2013 Aug 2;12:270. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-270.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of information regarding the epidemiology of malaria among travellers from non-malaria endemic countries to Sahelian areas. The literature provides general statistics about imported malaria in industrialized countries or extensive recommendations about fever management, but none of these recommendations are applicable to developing countries.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to evaluate the aetiologies of fever, malaria prevalence, and best diagnostic methods in a population of 306 non-malaria endemic travellers who, over a one-year period, consulted the French embassy's Centre Médico-Social in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) for fever. All patients underwent a clinical examination, a questionnaire, and three different malaria tests: thick blood film, QBC-test and HRP-2-based rapid diagnostic test.

RESULTS

Fever was caused by malaria in 69 cases (23%), while 37 (12%) were due to Pneumonia and 35 cases (8%) to ENT infections. Fever remained unexplained in 87 patients (51.3%). Malaria prevalence varied throughout the year: about 90% of malaria cases were diagnosed during and after the rainy season, between July and December, with up to 50% malaria prevalence for fever cases in October. Malaria diagnosis based solely on clinical signs, combined or not, leads to about 80% of unnecessary treatments.Although anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis was used in only 69% of short-stay patients (who travelled for less than three months), this was effective. Under local conditions, and using blood film examination as the reference method, the QBC test appeared to be more reliable than the HRP-2-based rapid diagnostic test, with respective sensitivities of 98.6% versus 84.1%, and specificities of 99.6% versus 98.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable biological diagnosis of malaria among travellers from non-malaria endemic countries in Sahelian areas is necessary because of low malaria prevalence and the poor performance of clinical diagnosis. A fever during the first half of the year requires investigating another aetiology, particularly a respiratory one. Malaria chemoprophylaxis is efficient and must not be overlooked. The QBC test appears to be the most reliable diagnostic test in this context.

摘要

背景

来自非疟疾流行国家前往萨赫勒地区的旅行者中疟疾的流行病学信息较为缺乏。文献中提供了工业化国家输入性疟疾的一般统计数据,或广泛的发热管理建议,但这些建议均不适用于发展中国家。

方法

本研究旨在评估 306 例来自非疟疾流行国家旅行者发热的病因、疟疾患病率和最佳诊断方法,这些旅行者在一年期间因发热前往法国驻布基纳法索瓦加杜古大使馆医疗中心就诊。所有患者均接受了临床检查、问卷调查和三种不同的疟疾检测:厚血涂片、QBC 检测和基于 HRP-2 的快速诊断检测。

结果

69 例(23%)发热由疟疾引起,37 例(12%)由肺炎引起,35 例(8%)由 ENT 感染引起。87 例(51.3%)患者发热原因不明。疟疾患病率全年呈波动变化:约 90%的疟疾病例发生在雨季和雨季之后,即 7 月至 12 月之间,10 月发热患者中疟疾患病率高达 50%。仅基于临床症状(联合或不联合)进行疟疾诊断会导致约 80%的不必要治疗。尽管仅有 69%的短期停留患者(停留时间不到三个月)使用了抗疟化学预防,但效果良好。在当地条件下,以血涂片检查为参考方法,QBC 检测似乎比基于 HRP-2 的快速诊断检测更可靠,其敏感性分别为 98.6%和 84.1%,特异性分别为 99.6%和 98.3%。

结论

由于萨赫勒地区非疟疾流行国家旅行者的疟疾患病率较低且临床诊断效果不佳,因此需要进行可靠的疟疾生物学诊断。上半年发热需要调查其他病因,特别是呼吸道病因。抗疟化学预防有效,不容忽视。在这种情况下,QBC 检测似乎是最可靠的诊断检测方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5e/3751538/0462229ac612/1475-2875-12-270-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验