• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未能充分利用与恋爱伴侣分享好消息:通过自我报告、伴侣报告和行为观察来探究社交焦虑者的积极面缺失。

Failure to capitalize on sharing good news with romantic partners: Exploring positivity deficits of socially anxious people with self-reports, partner-reports, and behavioral observations.

作者信息

Kashdan Todd B, Ferssizidis Patty, Farmer Antonina S, Adams Leah M, McKnight Patrick E

机构信息

George Mason University, United States.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2013 Oct;51(10):656-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2013.04.006
PMID:23916635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3776926/
Abstract

Extending prior work on social anxiety and positivity deficits, we examined whether individual differences in social anxiety alter the ability to share and respond to the good news of romantic partners (i.e., capitalization support) and how this influences romantic relationship satisfaction and commitment. In this study of 174 heterosexual couples (average age of 21.5 with 58.3% identifying as Caucasian), greater social anxiety was associated with the provision and receipt of less supportive responses to shared positive events as measured by trait questionnaires, partner reports, and behavioral observations in the laboratory. In longitudinal analyses, individuals in romantic relationships with socially anxious partners who experienced inadequate capitalization support were more likely to terminate their relationship and report a decline in relationship quality six months later. As evidence of construct specificity, social anxiety effects were independent of depressive symptoms. Taken together, social anxiety influenced a person's ability to receive and provide support for shared positive events; these deficits had adverse romantic consequences. Researchers and clinicians may better understand social anxiety by exploring a wider range of interpersonal contexts and positive constructs. The addition of capitalization support to the social anxiety literature offers new insights into interpersonal approaches and treatments.

摘要

在先前关于社交焦虑和积极情绪缺失的研究基础上,我们研究了社交焦虑的个体差异是否会改变分享和回应恋爱伴侣好消息的能力(即积极分享支持),以及这如何影响恋爱关系满意度和承诺度。在这项针对174对异性恋情侣(平均年龄21.5岁,58.3%为白人)的研究中,通过特质问卷、伴侣报告以及实验室行为观察发现,社交焦虑程度越高,对共同积极事件的支持性回应的提供和接受就越少。在纵向分析中,与社交焦虑伴侣处于恋爱关系且积极分享支持不足的个体,更有可能在六个月后终止恋爱关系,并报告恋爱关系质量下降。作为结构特异性的证据,社交焦虑的影响独立于抑郁症状。综合来看,社交焦虑会影响一个人接受和提供对共同积极事件的支持的能力;这些不足会对恋爱关系产生不利影响。研究人员和临床医生通过探索更广泛的人际情境和积极结构,可能会更好地理解社交焦虑。将积极分享支持纳入社交焦虑文献为人际方法和治疗提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5920/3776926/e89caa5e0e11/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5920/3776926/de0667397ad6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5920/3776926/e89caa5e0e11/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5920/3776926/de0667397ad6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5920/3776926/e89caa5e0e11/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Failure to capitalize on sharing good news with romantic partners: Exploring positivity deficits of socially anxious people with self-reports, partner-reports, and behavioral observations.未能充分利用与恋爱伴侣分享好消息:通过自我报告、伴侣报告和行为观察来探究社交焦虑者的积极面缺失。
Behav Res Ther. 2013 Oct;51(10):656-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 2.
2
Social Anxiety and Social Support in Romantic Relationships.浪漫关系中的社交焦虑与社会支持
Behav Ther. 2017 May;48(3):335-348. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
3
Capitalizing on everyday positive events uniquely predicts daily intimacy and well-being in couples coping with breast cancer.利用日常积极事件能独特地预测应对乳腺癌的夫妻的每日亲密度和幸福感。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Feb;29(1):69-79. doi: 10.1037/fam0000042. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
4
Attachment and capitalizing on positive events.依附并抓住积极事件。
Attach Hum Dev. 2013;15(3):281-302. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.782655. Epub 2013 Apr 14.
5
When the heat is on: romantic partner responses influence distress in socially anxious women.当热度上升时:浪漫伴侣的反应会影响社交焦虑女性的痛苦程度。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 May;44(5):737-48. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
6
On the relationship among social anxiety, intimacy, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction in young couples.论年轻夫妇中社交焦虑、亲密关系、性沟通和性满意度之间的关系。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jan;42(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9929-3. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Female informant-reports of male romantic partners' alcohol problems predict escalations in dyadic conflict in heterosexual couples.女性报告男性伴侣的酒精问题预测异性伴侣之间的冲突升级。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.034. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
Communication and social skills in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals in the context of romantic relationships.浪漫关系背景下社交焦虑和非焦虑个体的沟通与社交技能。
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Apr;43(4):505-19. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.010.
9
A Dyadic Analysis of Attachment Insecurities and Romantic Disengagement among Couples Seeking Relationship Therapy.夫妻寻求关系治疗时,不安全依恋与浪漫关系解体的对偶分析。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2020 Jul;46(3):399-412. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12422. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
10
"A well spent day brings happy sleep": A dyadic study of capitalization support in military-connected couples.“充实的一天带来酣眠”:军人配偶关系中的资本支持的对偶研究。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Oct;32(7):975-985. doi: 10.1037/fam0000469.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived responses, capitalization, and daily gratitude: Do age and closeness matter?感知反应、资本增值和日常感恩:年龄和亲密程度重要吗?
Emotion. 2024 Apr;24(3):867-877. doi: 10.1037/emo0001301. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Social feedback promotes positive social sharing, trust, and closeness.社会反馈促进积极的社会分享、信任和亲密。
Emotion. 2023 Sep;23(6):1536-1548. doi: 10.1037/emo0001182. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Will you be happy for me? Associations between self-reported, perceived, and observed responses to positive events and sexual well-being in cohabiting couples.

本文引用的文献

1
Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques.探究固定效应和多层回归中的交互作用:推断和图形技术。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2005;40(3):373-400. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5.
2
Distinguishing healthy adults from people with social anxiety disorder: evidence for the value of experiential avoidance and positive emotions in everyday social interactions.区分健康成年人和社交焦虑障碍患者:日常社交互动中经验回避和积极情绪的价值证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Aug;122(3):645-55. doi: 10.1037/a0032733. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
3
Biased attentional processing of positive stimuli in social anxiety disorder: an eye movement study.
你会为我感到高兴吗?同居伴侣对积极事件的自我报告、感知和观察到的反应与性健康之间的关联。
J Soc Pers Relat. 2022 Aug;39(8):2454-2477. doi: 10.1177/02654075221080581. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
Sharing positive events: Ecological momentary assessment of emotion regulation via social capitalization in schizotypy.分享积极事件:通过精神分裂症的社会资本化进行情绪调节的生态瞬时评估。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Feb;308:114377. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114377. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
Responding to Positive Emotions at Work - The Four Steps and Potential Benefits of a Validating Response to Coworkers' Positive Experiences.回应工作中的积极情绪——对同事积极经历做出认可回应的四个步骤及潜在益处。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 11;12:668160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668160. eCollection 2021.
6
Affective Benefits of Parental Engagement with Adolescent Positive Daily Life Experiences.父母参与青少年积极日常生活经历的情感益处。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Oct;50(10):2036-2051. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01484-2. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
7
Social context and the real-world consequences of social anxiety.社交情境与社交焦虑的现实后果。
Psychol Med. 2020 Sep;50(12):1989-2000. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002022. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Examining the Relation Between Adolescent Social Anxiety and Positive Affect Regulation: Self-Report vs. Observation.考察青少年社交焦虑与积极情绪调节之间的关系:自我报告与观察。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Oct;50(5):764-775. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00881-w.
9
Positive and Negative Affect as Links Between Social Anxiety and Depression: Predicting Concurrent and Prospective Mood Symptoms in Unipolar and Bipolar Mood Disorders.积极和消极情绪作为社交焦虑和抑郁之间的联系:在单相和双相情感障碍中预测并发和前瞻性情绪症状。
Behav Ther. 2017 Nov;48(6):820-833. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
10
Empathy for positive and negative emotions in social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍中对积极和消极情绪的同理心。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Dec;87:232-242. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
社交焦虑障碍中对正性刺激的有偏向的注意力加工:一项眼动研究。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(2):96-107. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2012.666562. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
4
Social anxiety and emotion regulation in daily life: spillover effects on positive and negative social events.社交焦虑与日常生活中的情绪调节:积极和消极社会事件的溢出效应。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(2):152-62. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2012.666561. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
5
Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being.超越积极心理学?走向心理过程和幸福感的情境观点。
Am Psychol. 2012 Feb-Mar;67(2):101-10. doi: 10.1037/a0024572. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
6
Cognitive therapy vs interpersonal psychotherapy in social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial.社交焦虑障碍中认知疗法与人际心理治疗的对比:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;68(7):692-700. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.67.
7
Whether, how, and when social anxiety shapes positive experiences and events: a self-regulatory framework and treatment implications.社交焦虑如何、以及何时塑造积极体验和事件:一个自我调节框架及治疗启示。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;31(5):786-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.012. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
8
Perceived and capitalization support are substantially similar: implications for social support theory.感知支持和资本支持基本相似:对社会支持理论的启示。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Aug;37(8):1068-79. doi: 10.1177/0146167211406507. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
9
Capturing the biases of socially anxious people by addressing partner effects and situational parameters.捕捉社交焦虑人群的偏见,关注伴侣效应和情境参数。
Behav Ther. 2011 Jun;42(2):211-23. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.07.004. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
10
Effects of social anxiety and depressive symptoms on the frequency and quality of sexual activity: a daily process approach.社交焦虑和抑郁症状对性行为频率和质量的影响:一种日常过程方法。
Behav Res Ther. 2011 May;49(5):352-60. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.