• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察性研究中识别有意义的异质性治疗效果的通用框架:一种参数化数据自适应G计算方法。

Generalized framework for identifying meaningful heterogenous treatment effects in observational studies: A parametric data-adaptive G-computation approach.

作者信息

Nianogo Roch A, O'Neill Stephen, Inoue Kosuke

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA.

California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):648-662. doi: 10.1177/09622802251316969. Epub 2025 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1177/09622802251316969
PMID:39995162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075891/
Abstract

There has been a renewed interest in identifying heterogenous treatment effects (HTEs) to guide personalized medicine. The objective was to illustrate the use of a step-by-step transparent parametric data-adaptive approach (the generalized HTE approach) based on the G-computation algorithm to detect heterogenous subgroups and estimate meaningful conditional average treatment effects (CATE). The following seven steps implement the generalized HTE approach: Step 1: Select variables that satisfy the backdoor criterion and potential effect modifiers; Step 2: Specify a flexible saturated model including potential confounders and effect modifiers; Step 3: Apply a selection method to reduce overfitting; Step 4: Predict potential outcomes under treatment and no treatment; Step 5: Contrast the potential outcomes for each individual; Step 6: Fit cluster modeling to identify potential effect modifiers; Step 7: Estimate subgroup CATEs. We illustrated the use of this approach using simulated and real data. Our generalized HTE approach successfully identified HTEs and subgroups defined by all effect modifiers using simulated and real data. Our study illustrates that it is feasible to use a step-by-step parametric and transparent data-adaptive approach to detect effect modifiers and identify meaningful HTEs in an observational setting. This approach should be more appealing to epidemiologists interested in explanation.

摘要

为指导个性化医疗,人们对识别异质性治疗效果(HTE)重新产生了兴趣。目的是说明如何使用基于G计算算法的逐步透明参数数据自适应方法(广义HTE方法)来检测异质性亚组并估计有意义的条件平均治疗效果(CATE)。广义HTE方法通过以下七个步骤实现:步骤1:选择满足后门标准和潜在效应修饰因素的变量;步骤2:指定一个灵活的饱和模型,包括潜在混杂因素和效应修饰因素;步骤3:应用选择方法以减少过度拟合;步骤4:预测治疗和未治疗情况下的潜在结果;步骤5:对比每个个体的潜在结果;步骤6:进行聚类建模以识别潜在效应修饰因素;步骤7:估计亚组CATE。我们使用模拟数据和真实数据说明了该方法的应用。我们的广义HTE方法使用模拟数据和真实数据成功识别了由所有效应修饰因素定义的HTE和亚组。我们的研究表明,在观察性研究中,使用逐步参数化且透明的数据自适应方法来检测效应修饰因素并识别有意义的HTE是可行的。这种方法应该会对热衷于解释的流行病学家更具吸引力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537c/12075891/91252b2adf82/10.1177_09622802251316969-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537c/12075891/57005967b2ce/10.1177_09622802251316969-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537c/12075891/91252b2adf82/10.1177_09622802251316969-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537c/12075891/57005967b2ce/10.1177_09622802251316969-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537c/12075891/91252b2adf82/10.1177_09622802251316969-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Generalized framework for identifying meaningful heterogenous treatment effects in observational studies: A parametric data-adaptive G-computation approach.观察性研究中识别有意义的异质性治疗效果的通用框架:一种参数化数据自适应G计算方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):648-662. doi: 10.1177/09622802251316969. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Application of causal forests to randomised controlled trial data to identify heterogeneous treatment effects: a case study.将因果森林应用于随机对照试验数据以识别异质性治疗效果:一项案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02489-2.
3
Causal inference using multivariate generalized linear mixed-effects models.使用多元广义线性混合效应模型进行因果推断。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae100.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Outcome risk model development for heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses: a comparison of non-parametric machine learning methods and semi-parametric statistical methods.治疗效果分析异质性的结局风险模型开发:非参数机器学习方法与半参数统计方法的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02265-8.
6
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
Overview of modern approaches for identifying and evaluating heterogeneous treatment effects from clinical data.从临床数据中识别和评估异质治疗效果的现代方法概述。
Clin Trials. 2023 Aug;20(4):380-393. doi: 10.1177/17407745231174544. Epub 2023 May 19.
8
Model assessment in dynamic treatment regimen estimation via double robustness.通过双重稳健性进行动态治疗方案估计中的模型评估
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):855-64. doi: 10.1111/biom.12468. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
Preventing false discovery of heterogeneous treatment effect subgroups in randomized trials.预防随机试验中异质性治疗效果亚组的错误发现。
Trials. 2018 Jul 16;19(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2774-5.
10
Iterative Causal Forest: A Novel Algorithm for Subgroup Identification.迭代因果森林:一种新的亚组识别算法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 May 7;193(5):764-776. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad219.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine-learning-based high-benefit approach versus conventional high-risk approach in blood pressure management.基于机器学习的高获益方法与血压管理中的传统高风险方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1243-1256. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad037.
2
Heterogeneity in the Association Between the Presence of Coronary Artery Calcium and Cardiovascular Events: A Machine-Learning Approach in the MESA Study.冠状动脉钙存在与心血管事件之间的关联存在异质性:MESA 研究中的机器学习方法。
Circulation. 2023 Jan 10;147(2):132-141. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062626. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
3
A Machine-Learning Approach for Estimating Subgroup- and Individual-Level Treatment Effects: An Illustration Using the 65 Trial.
一种用于估计亚组和个体水平治疗效果的机器学习方法:以65项试验为例
Med Decis Making. 2022 Oct;42(7):923-936. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221100717. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment on clinical failure in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection.奥司他韦治疗对住院下呼吸道感染患者临床失败的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06812-2.
5
Kidney Function, Kidney Function Decline, and the Risk of Dementia in Older Adults: A Registry-Based Study.老年人的肾功能、肾功能衰退与痴呆风险:一项基于登记处的研究
Neurology. 2021 Jun 14;96(24):e2956-e2965. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012113.
6
Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods.可解释人工智能:机器学习可解释性方法综述
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;23(1):18. doi: 10.3390/e23010018.
7
Hypothetical blood-pressure-lowering interventions and risk of stroke and dementia.降压干预与卒中和痴呆风险的假设。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;36(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00694-5. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
Machine learning analysis plans for randomised controlled trials: detecting treatment effect heterogeneity with strict control of type I error.机器学习分析计划在随机对照试验中的应用:在严格控制Ⅰ类错误的情况下检测治疗效果的异质性。
Trials. 2020 Feb 10;21(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4076-y.
9
Effects of Hypothetical Interventions on Ischemic Stroke Using Parametric G-Formula.应用参数 G 公式分析假设干预对缺血性脑卒中的影响。
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3286-3288. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025749. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
Hypothesis-generating and confirmatory studies, Bonferroni correction, and pre-specification of trial endpoints.假设生成与验证性研究、邦费罗尼校正以及试验终点的预先设定。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):297. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1612624. Epub 2019 May 14.