The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Sep;26(5):481-8. doi: 10.1111/jar.12033.
Previous studies of anger management in people with intellectual disability failed to control for the effects of the number of provocative stimuli presented and lacked direct measures of behaviour and treatment integrity data.
This experiment systematically assessed and presented discriminative stimuli for aggressive behaviour, taught alternative behaviour in response to discriminative stimuli for aggressive behaviour and used behavioural skills training with three adults with mild intellectual disability.
Following behavioural skills training, the adult's percentage of aggressive responses declined and replacement responses increased in response to provocative stimuli. Treatment gains generalized to novel antecedent events, novel staff and novel settings and were socially valid. After intervention, community trips increased for all three participants.
Behavioural skills training to teach alternate behaviour to aggression with carefully planned procedures to promote generalization caused a socially valid increase in alternate behaviour and a socially valid decrease in aggression.
之前有关智力障碍者愤怒管理的研究未能控制所呈现的刺激性刺激的数量,并且缺乏行为和治疗完整性数据的直接测量。
本实验系统地评估并呈现了攻击性行为的辨别性刺激,针对攻击性行为的辨别性刺激教授了替代行为,并对三名轻度智力障碍的成年人使用了行为技能培训。
在行为技能培训之后,成年人对挑衅性刺激的攻击反应的百分比下降,而替代反应的百分比增加。治疗效果在新颖的先行事件、新的工作人员和新的环境中得到推广,具有社会有效性。干预后,所有三名参与者的社区旅行都有所增加。
通过精心设计的程序来教授替代行为以对抗攻击性行为的行为技能培训导致替代行为的社会有效性增加和攻击性的社会有效性降低。