1U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Nov;17(4):355-70. doi: 10.1177/1088868313497999. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
An extensive research literature has examined the reactions of individuals facing interpersonal rejection. Small groups can also be rejected, but current research tells us little about the experiences of groups and their members directly. We integrate findings from various literatures to gain insight into shared rejection experiences and their outcomes. Of most practical importance, we argue that groups can be expected to react with more hostility than individuals when rejected. Four existing models that account for how group processes might alter such reactions are examined: a need-threat model, a rejection-identification model, a multimotive model, and a dual attitudes model. Aspects of these models are then integrated into a unifying framework that is useful for understanding hostile reactions to group marginalization. Implications for natural groups such as terrorist cells, school cliques, racial and ethnic minorities, and gangs are discussed.
大量研究文献考察了个体面对人际拒绝时的反应。小团体也可能被拒绝,但目前的研究很少直接了解团体及其成员的经历。我们整合了来自不同文献的研究结果,以深入了解共同的拒绝经历及其结果。最具实际意义的是,我们认为当被拒绝时,团体比个体更有可能表现出敌意。我们考察了四种现有的可以解释群体过程如何改变这种反应的模型:需求威胁模型、拒绝认同模型、多动机模型和双重态度模型。然后,将这些模型的各个方面整合到一个统一的框架中,有助于理解对群体边缘化的敌意反应。我们讨论了这些模型对自然群体(如恐怖细胞、学校派系、种族和少数民族以及帮派)的影响。