Clark-Daniels C L, Daniels R S, Baumhover L A
Center for the Study of Aging, College of Community Health Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487.
Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Sep;19(9):970-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82556-9.
Alabama emergency department personnel were surveyed in 1988 concerning elder abuse and Alabama's mandatory reporting and protective services law. Most ED personnel did not understand the requirements of the law. While emergency physicians, registered nurses, and licensed practical nurses had seen cases of elder abuse in their careers, differences existed in their satisfaction with the disposition of cases reported to state authorities. Licensed practical nurses and physicians reported greater satisfaction with the response received; registered nurses were much less satisfied. However, all accepted responsibility for reporting elder abuse. ED registered nurses and emergency physicians were divided on the degree to which they could diagnose elder abuse, did not believe there were sufficient services to care for those who had been abused, and were unsure whether there were procedures for reporting cases of elder abuse. All ED personnel need to know that cases they report will result in protection of abuse victims.
1988年,针对虐待老年人以及阿拉巴马州的强制报告和保护服务法,对阿拉巴马州急诊科工作人员进行了调查。大多数急诊科工作人员不理解该法律的要求。虽然急诊医生、注册护士和执业护士在其职业生涯中都见过虐待老年人的案例,但他们对向州当局报告的案例处理情况的满意度存在差异。执业护士和医生对收到的回应表示更满意;注册护士的满意度则低得多。然而,所有人都接受了报告虐待老年人情况的责任。急诊科注册护士和急诊医生在他们诊断虐待老年人的能力程度上存在分歧,不相信有足够的服务来照顾受虐者,并且不确定是否有报告虐待老年人案例的程序。所有急诊科工作人员都需要知道,他们报告的案例将能保护虐待受害者。