Jones J S, Veenstra T R, Seamon J P, Krohmer J
Department of Emergency Medicine, Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. Compuserve 70602,706
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Oct;30(4):473-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70007-6.
To determine the perceived magnitude of elder mistreatment, physician awareness of applicable state laws, and the barriers to reporting suspected cases, we surveyed a random sample of 3,000 members of the American College of Emergency Physicians in the United States. Survey questions included practice characteristics, number and type of suspected cases of elder mistreatment seen in the ED, number of cases actually reported, and reasons for not reporting abuse. Physicians were also asked about the availability of elder-mistreatment protocols and their familiarity with local laws and reporting requirements. We received 705 completed surveys, for a response rate of 24%. Most physicians (52%) described elder mistreatment as prevalent but less so than spouse or child abuse. The respondents had evaluated a mean of 4 +/- 8 (range, 0 to 93) suspected cases of elder mistreatment in the preceding 12 months; approximately 50% were reported. Only 31% of emergency physicians reported having a written protocol for the reporting of elder mistreatment, and physicians were generally not familiar with applicable state laws. Twenty-five percent were able to recall educational content pertaining to elder mistreatment during their emergency medicine residencies. Most physicians were not certain or did not believe that clear-cut medical definitions of elder abuse or neglect exist (74%); that emergency physicians can accurately identify cases of mistreatment (58%); or that their states had sufficient resources to meet the needs of victims (92%). These results suggest that practicing emergency physicians are not confident in identifying or reporting geriatric victims of abuse or neglect. This lack of confidence may reflect inadequacies of training, research, and continuing education with regard to mistreatment of older people.
为了确定对老年人虐待的感知程度、医生对适用州法律的知晓情况以及报告疑似病例的障碍,我们对美国3000名急诊医师学会成员进行了随机抽样调查。调查问题包括执业特点、在急诊科所见疑似老年人虐待病例的数量和类型、实际报告的病例数量以及未报告虐待行为的原因。还询问了医生关于老年人虐待协议的可用性以及他们对当地法律和报告要求的熟悉程度。我们收到了705份完整的调查问卷,回复率为24%。大多数医生(52%)认为老年人虐待很普遍,但不如配偶或儿童虐待那么普遍。在过去12个月中,受访者平均评估了4±8例(范围为0至93例)疑似老年人虐待病例;约50%的病例得到了报告。只有31%的急诊医生报告有书面的老年人虐待报告协议,而且医生们普遍不熟悉适用的州法律。25%的医生能够回忆起他们在急诊医学住院医师培训期间与老年人虐待相关的教育内容。大多数医生不确定或不相信存在明确的老年人虐待或忽视的医学定义(74%);急诊医生能够准确识别虐待病例(58%);或者他们所在的州有足够的资源满足受害者的需求(92%)。这些结果表明,执业急诊医生在识别或报告受虐待或被忽视的老年受害者方面缺乏信心。这种信心的缺乏可能反映出在老年人虐待方面的培训、研究和继续教育存在不足。